General Discussion

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)

60. So you have nothing useful to contribute to the discussion

Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:56 AM

Apr 2013

Typical of those who are in favor of gun control, unable to argue logically or come up with facts to disprove a statement, they fall back on insulting the people they disagree with. Just another firearm reality denier with a control complex.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What rank & file police officers think about gun-control [View all] Lurks Often Apr 2013 OP

Hmmm - the survey was completed from a police products commercial website. haele Apr 2013 #1

It matches other surveys Lurks Often Apr 2013 #2

The methodology is not concrete bossy22 Apr 2013 #8

That's an understatement. Gormy Cuss Apr 2013 #46

Sorry, bunch of gun porn at link. Hoyt Apr 2013 #3

No surprises for me. I know a few police officers. They're level-headed, intelligent people who... slackmaster Apr 2013 #4

Then, why to gungeoneers feel they need to arm up to match police? Hoyt Apr 2013 #5

Do you have evidence to support that assertion? bossy22 Apr 2013 #7

Which one? First one - go read gungeon, I think you are familiar with it. Hoyt Apr 2013 #9

I looked at the site- It is a police industry forum bossy22 Apr 2013 #11

And 80% admit to toting in public when off duty. It's biased in many aspects. Hoyt Apr 2013 #13

Many depts require their officers to carry when off duty. NutmegYankee Apr 2013 #17

Yes. Another example of bias. Hoyt Apr 2013 #24

not bias, its an officer safety issue founded on past experience loli phabay Apr 2013 #67

Prove it. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #54

Liberty = freedom of choice slackmaster Apr 2013 #62

Because it justifies their over-the-top militarization. nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #6

The ones I know (several) don't like being out gunned by nuts. rmax Apr 2013 #12

Where on earth do you live?!? Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #14

Well, it's kind of a mix. Local laws restrict the cops and the "villians" have whatever. rmax Apr 2013 #16

Here in Portland... Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #18

They need those in Portland? Seriously? Busting up pot farms or something? rmax Apr 2013 #20

Seems a bit much to me, too. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #21

Glocks don't have balance - hence the lack of accuracy. They're throw-aways. rmax Apr 2013 #23

'Remmington' making a lot of handguns now, are they? jmg257 Apr 2013 #61

I don't think Remington... Bay Boy Apr 2013 #63

Glocks jam? cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #30

Well over a thousand rounds with my Model 19. No jams. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #32

I'm throwing the BS challenge flag sarisataka Apr 2013 #33

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #35

Holy Crap! In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #36

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #38

Do you really feel the need for that many weapons? In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #40

Thanks for answering the challenge sarisataka Apr 2013 #42

I don't understand your post. rrneck Apr 2013 #34

See post # 35! In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #37

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #39

Well then, lets have a look... rrneck Apr 2013 #41

SorryI was not clear. I disagree with everything that was in the PPRed post. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #43

You seem very confused about numerous weapons, and police access to them. jmg257 Apr 2013 #59

Without crosstabs, this data is worthless... Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #15

You may want to extend that thought process to it's conclusion: Lurks Often Apr 2013 #26

Wow. That's an impressive leap into illogic Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #44

Where did you get that from? Lurks Often Apr 2013 #45

You must not live in a rural area... Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #48

There are bad cops everywhere and Lurks Often Apr 2013 #50

OK Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #64

I think you are seeing a causal link where none exists Lurks Often Apr 2013 #65

I see the link because you keep insisting that it's there.... Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #68

No, my opinion is based on seeing these patterns Lurks Often Apr 2013 #69

He said, back-pedaling all the way... Jeff In Milwaukee Apr 2013 #70

Even with crosstabs it's probably meaningless. Gormy Cuss Apr 2013 #47

This sample is apparently full of assholes and psychopaths. Robb Apr 2013 #19

So what you are saying that Lurks Often Apr 2013 #25

I'll take that as a "yes." Robb Apr 2013 #27

I'm glad we agree that your post is Lurks Often Apr 2013 #28

Of those that take an interest in politics...most rank/file police officers are conservative morons. AgainsttheCrown Apr 2013 #22

I need a shower... 99Forever Apr 2013 #49

Your overwhelming display of logic has won me over!!!!! Lurks Often Apr 2013 #51

Why would I care what you think? 99Forever Apr 2013 #52

So you have nothing useful to contribute to the discussion Lurks Often Apr 2013 #60

Feel better now? Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #53

Ahhh gee... 99Forever Apr 2013 #55

Oooh! Bolded and underlined means it's MORE TRUER!! Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #56

Get it straight lady.. 99Forever Apr 2013 #57

Continuing to employ an insulting term isn't "getting it straight." Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #58

The people at police one are horrible. Union Scribe Apr 2013 #66