Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
18. Grayson has it right.
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 12:09 AM
Apr 2013

I worked hard for Obama in 2 campaigns and now I am ready to primary any so called democrat who supports the President on the issue of Chained CPI. In fact I am read to primary any democrat that even supports a grand bargain while the HOUSE is controlled by the gerrymandered republicans. We never voted for a long term bargain and we do not need it now.
Remember Obama did not win the election. He cannot vote but once. We voters won it, and we must make sure our representastives do our bidding or face consequences.
I heard progressives showed up at the White House with 2.4 million signatures. That is a good start. How about we go for 50 million who will vote against any democrat who supports the chained CPI? That would be pretty motivating.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wait, I thought journalists where supposed to kiss ass... Deep13 Apr 2013 #1
Chris Matthews is the one on MSNBC who kisses butt... AndyA Apr 2013 #2
If Obama cannot get anything done CountAllVotes Apr 2013 #3
Grow a spine or resign. I agree completely on point Apr 2013 #11
Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #20
Loudestlib, there are many right wing bloggers Iliyah Apr 2013 #25
Let me get this straight. 1st Democratic President to talk about cutting SSA and we aren't allowed Katashi_itto Apr 2013 #38
The White House has to start realizing fadedrose Apr 2013 #4
Yeah, I'm kind of surprised DU isn't throwing Rachel to the wolves tavalon Apr 2013 #19
fadedrose, the WH does Iliyah Apr 2013 #26
I think you're right. mimi85 Apr 2013 #31
She did tear him a new one malaise Apr 2013 #5
If only RGinNJ Apr 2013 #6
She should stick it to each and every White House operative she can. Those posers. ancianita Apr 2013 #7
Point of order cadaverdog Apr 2013 #8
I wanted to post that too! xtraxritical Apr 2013 #14
we ought to start a pinned thread of mish-mash word use. grasswire Apr 2013 #34
"And what now, is the shortfall replaced with....?" Dragonfli Apr 2013 #9
U may be on to something. The chained CPI Is about consumers moving to on point Apr 2013 #12
Exactly. And if you are eating cat food then you obviously didnt need decent fool so your benefits rhett o rick Apr 2013 #24
I heard (I think it was Reich) saying a large part of seniors' money goes to health gateley Apr 2013 #30
It will certainly add to an existing problem, some seniors already take half their meds Dragonfli Apr 2013 #33
Rachel is the best! leftieNanner Apr 2013 #10
She even termed it "hippy punching" by the White House to establish some cred neverforget Apr 2013 #13
As a 61 year old "hippie" JEB Apr 2013 #15
Rachel was spot on Indridc0ld Apr 2013 #16
Welcome to DU Indridc0ld! hrmjustin Apr 2013 #17
Thank you Indridc0ld Apr 2013 #21
Glad to hear it! hrmjustin Apr 2013 #22
Thanks Indrid0ld! Iliyah Apr 2013 #23
Yep, welcome. defacto7 Apr 2013 #28
Welcome to DU, Indridc0ld dmr Apr 2013 #36
Grayson has it right. daybranch Apr 2013 #18
So the "Hayes and Maddow haven't covered Chained CPI" meme here at DU can finally go away? TeamPooka Apr 2013 #27
I just watched on the MSNBC site -- she REALLY didn't give an inch! gateley Apr 2013 #29
We were beyond stupid to give a millimeter without hellish cost to any and all that touched it TheKentuckian Apr 2013 #32
Time for Rachel to use the position that her talent, work, and the gods of chance put her in. delrem Apr 2013 #35
Good Job Rachel.... supercats Apr 2013 #37
Axelrod does not believe one word he is saying Skittles Apr 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Love me some Rachel Maddo...»Reply #18