General Discussion

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)

44. Thank you, again you made me laugh out loud

Reply to IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ (Reply #17)

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 08:57 PM

Apr 2013

I will admit I am extremely annoyed with a couple of 'brown" children, as you call them.

One of them has been breaking his curfew and his grades have slipped. The other is bringing her laundry home from University. Interestingly, I don't think of them as "brown" children, I think of them as my children. (1/2 of their ancestors come from the area now known as Pakistan/Afghanistan) When we actively protested the wars, it was personal.

I have actively sought common ground with some gun enthusiasts here ... not the ones using right wing terminology .... or the ones that "guns" appear to be the tipping point for. I have sought conciliation with the bright and compassionate members here that also have some attachment to guns. With them, I think it is better to agree to disagree on one subject and embrace our common goals.

With you ... your railing is very funny ... I must stop now. You have phrased your post as a personal attack, yet I can't take ignorant ramblings personally.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone else have a problem with Schumer/Feinstein leading gun control charge? [View all] IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 OP

There is a very big difference between firearm confiscation and firearem regulation. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #1

Please IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #2

Ah, now you're talking. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #5

I would have to disagree about mag limits. rrneck Apr 2013 #73

Heck, the NRA doesn't allow yahoos to pack guns in their building, Hoyt Apr 2013 #36

And you supported Iraq War enablers IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #48

Nope, I'm against the right wing, warmongering, bigots at NRA. Hoyt Apr 2013 #56

"the NRA doesn't allow yahoos to pack guns in their building" ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #74

Nope, nor do they allow them in their conventions. Now NRA does have a range downstairs where Hoyt Apr 2013 #77

We should support them 100% mwrguy Apr 2013 #3

You won't take my guns IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #4

You're right, I won't. mwrguy Apr 2013 #6

No, 1%er living in your rich, elitist neighorhood IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #9

Civil war? LOL mwrguy Apr 2013 #11

Lol! IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #12

derp Electric Monk Apr 2013 #35

Looks like we have a contagious case of herp derp here IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #41

Interesting assumptions and projection you've got going on Electric Monk Apr 2013 #45

They won't have to. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #63

You do realize the vast majority of those "professionals" oppose disarming citizens, right? Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #61

So, you really are not "law-abiding". That's been my impression of most gun cultists. Hoyt Apr 2013 #70

If you WIKI or GOOGLE Feinstein and Shumer so you KNOW KoKo Apr 2013 #7

I don't even know what your post is saying IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #10

Nope. No problem with Schumer/Feinstein leading gun control charge. Actually, I think Obama is JaneyVee Apr 2013 #8

Janey's got a gun IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #13

Ban assault weapons & high cap magazines + fix gun show loopholes & universal background checks. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #16

Not going to happen IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #20

I doubt you're psychic abilities. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #22

Let me test them: IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #34

I doubt your ability to understand the definition of psychic. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #43

You're confusing shallow with sarcastic IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #50

Nope. Not confusing the two. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #55

Not a problem at all etherealtruth Apr 2013 #14

The gun grabbers are just as pathetic as the fetus worshippers IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #17

What an incredibly dumb thing to say. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #19

Cause you can't answer my point that it's hypocrisy. IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #26

Your post is full of holes (no pun intended). NO ONE votes to murder people overseas. (Maybe Neocons JaneyVee Apr 2013 #29

Good job janey! IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #37

I was talking about the public voting. U.S. Senators job is to protect it's citizens/States. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #40

Well I wasn't talking about the public voting so it IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #46

Yeah, like gun control is a new idea. You're hilarious. The Wild West had stronger gun control JaneyVee Apr 2013 #53

Thank you, again you made me laugh out loud etherealtruth Apr 2013 #44

At least this is two who has taken a stand on reasonable sensible weapons, many others has not. Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #15

Yes I have read them IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #18

Because you're too lazy to carry 2 10 round magazines? JaneyVee Apr 2013 #21

and this is documented where? Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #23

13th paragraph down. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #28

Also here . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #49

Well why not just ban guns altogether then? IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #24

Because our country is a Nation of Laws bound by the Constitution. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #25

Please stop pretending that you care about the Second Amendment IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #30

Please stop pretending you know my position on anything regarding my beliefs & opinions. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #32

And some gun enthusiasts like to pretend . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #52

Are you a bad Marksmen then you mightvrequire more rounds. Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #69

I believe Mayor Bloomberg is leading the charge on that. nt limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #27

Really? What state does he represent in the Senate? IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #31

Well he's putting money and clout behind it. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #38

Don't you just love it when 1%ers buy the political outcomes they want? Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #65

You lost me at "gun grabbers". PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #33

Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #39

Oh I see, you weren't actually looking to discuss, just bait and fight. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #42

No I would like to discuss it IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Apr 2013 #47

I've moved onto the topic of 'gun nuts' hoping to arm fetuses. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #51

Oh, the poor pitiful OP author etherealtruth Apr 2013 #54

And he sent me this PM PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #59

I can one up you etherealtruth Apr 2013 #62

These are the very nutcases that should not be armed. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #64

I know etherealtruth Apr 2013 #67

I hope you alerted on the PM as well. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #66

I did etherealtruth Apr 2013 #68

OP has left the building. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #71

Good job, MIRT :) Electric Monk Apr 2013 #78

** DEAR IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ ** I did not alert on any of your posts. PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #57

However, Ma'am, I Would Suggest You Alert On That Abusive PM.... The Magistrate Apr 2013 #58

I did. Here's my reply: PeaceNikki Apr 2013 #60

Only in that they're not going nearly far enough. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2013 #72

If you're against it, I'm for it. Iggo Apr 2013 #75

Naw Spirochete Apr 2013 #76