Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pipoman

(16,038 posts)

10. LOL

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #5)

Wed Apr 17, 2013, 10:46 PM

Apr 2013

You mean the one adopted by every member of SCOTUS, the President, and nearly every constitutional scholar in the US? Everyone has realized (except the far fringe) that if it was supposed to mean what the pretenders said it means it would have been written, " A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the militia to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." But of coarse it doesn't and that is why virtually nobody who matters is carrying that water..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ya know, maybe we're approaching this whole 2nd Amendment thing the wrong way... [View all] Flying Squirrel Apr 2013 OP

Better check the definition of "arms"..it apparently isn't what you think.. pipoman Apr 2013 #1

Yeah, but "milita" is exactly what it says. Hoyt Apr 2013 #2

How so...it is exactly what it says.. pipoman Apr 2013 #4

Not that warped interpretation again. Hoyt Apr 2013 #5

LOL pipoman Apr 2013 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #3

Let's see...as the country turns increasingly Blue Canadian-style gun control is coming to apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #8

Yeah, that was quite evident today. Skip Intro Apr 2013 #9

LOL pipoman Apr 2013 #12

"it is in poart to discuagg issue gtwettn oher duers but this is talkinb bad about other duers" apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #14

According to the latest Gallup polling... Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #15

no. start some well REGULATED militias. 1 weekend a month pansypoo53219 Apr 2013 #6

Let's see them haul their plumpnesses over the obstacle course kenny blankenship Apr 2013 #24

Congress has the power to raise the tax on ammunition to prohibitive levels, just like cigarettes. apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #7

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #11

I'm curious what make a particular round "hunting" vs. "assault" kudzu22 Apr 2013 #16

Q.E.D.: apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #17

Do I look worried? kudzu22 Apr 2013 #21

You sure seem to be - posting reply after reply while insisting such efforts are "doomed." apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #23

how about a prohibitive tax on say... Atlatl Apr 2013 #18

How about not, as that is utter false equivalence. And Q.E.D. III (so far). Enjoy your, umm, stay... apocalypsehow Apr 2013 #20

Abortions are already all but unobtainable in many states Fumesucker Apr 2013 #26

You do realize Chris Rock is a comedian, no? pipoman Apr 2013 #25

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are comedians also. Fumesucker Apr 2013 #27

This thread is hilarious and pathetic Redfairen Apr 2013 #13

As I stated in another thread, I'd feel better if our gun laws were more like Britain or Australia. nomorenomore08 Apr 2013 #19

Gun Safety Needs to be an issue people vote on hepkat Apr 2013 #22

so is anyone who owns a gun a member of your "Gun Owning Death Cult"? cali Apr 2013 #28

absolutely not hepkat Apr 2013 #29

The way to win the debate Shankapotomus Apr 2013 #30