Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That could happen. madaboutharry Apr 2013 #1
In one article I read . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #2
He is toast without that charge anyway. 3 murders, bombs, attempted murder, etc. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #3
Well yeah but I still want to know MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #6
Well, he tried to run over cops also. So that is multiple felonys. But I agree, that would be..... Logical Apr 2013 #7
If you run over someone with a car, how is that involuntary? LisaL Apr 2013 #15
He was escaping. Not trying to kill his brother. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #20
So as long as you are escaping, you are allowed to run people over? LisaL Apr 2013 #22
A murder charge requires intent. There was none. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #23
Felony murder doesn't require intent to murder. LisaL Apr 2013 #27
Not in the case of second-degree murder anneboleyn Apr 2013 #35
The answer you seek is not as simple as you wish it to be. Jenoch Apr 2013 #17
As long as the contacts aren't dirty. krispos42 Apr 2013 #18
If he caused his brother's death death then I hope he is charged. n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #4
It's up to the DA - not murder though dballance Apr 2013 #5
You don't need intent for third degree murder MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #8
No intent needed for second degree murder either anneboleyn Apr 2013 #36
wow SmileyRose Apr 2013 #9
I thought about the missing work thing too MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #11
Great! longship Apr 2013 #24
The only thing crass and unthinking is to not consider it MaineLinePhilly Apr 2013 #38
They caught the guy after the shelter was lifted malaise Apr 2013 #44
Someone on the radio likened it to a snow day treestar Apr 2013 #43
Technically he could be Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #10
I want to know the same thing. Kalidurga Apr 2013 #12
Apparently, the brother wasn't yet dead when he arrived at the hospital. LisaL Apr 2013 #14
Did not know that. Kalidurga Apr 2013 #16
It sure didn't. LisaL Apr 2013 #19
I saw that too. I'm sure it was an FBI person - not just a witness n/t patricia92243 Apr 2013 #31
No, that was the guy living in the builiding next to the scene. LisaL Apr 2013 #32
See Comment #28 Tx4obama Apr 2013 #29
I think he was pronounced dead upon arriving at the hospital lunatica Apr 2013 #41
Well, if medical examiner determines he died because of being run over, then I fail to see why not. LisaL Apr 2013 #13
He probably could be, but why? bluedigger Apr 2013 #21
Its possible. HooptieWagon Apr 2013 #25
+1 . . . hope so! - n/t fleur-de-lisa Apr 2013 #26
Yes, MA has the felony murder rule. And fleeing the police in a vehicle is a felony. Loudly Apr 2013 #33
Tamerlan Tsarnaev Injuries: Doctor Says Dead Bombing Suspect Had Wounds 'Head To Toe' Tx4obama Apr 2013 #28
Being shot and then run over will do that. LisaL Apr 2013 #30
He also had a blast wound in his torso. HooptieWagon Apr 2013 #39
No. onenote Apr 2013 #34
All I know is defacto7 Apr 2013 #37
It would probably be manslaughter if they charged him lunatica Apr 2013 #40
Makes sense treestar Apr 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will the surviving bombin...»Reply #33