General Discussion

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)

5. You aren't really conversant with firearms I suspect

Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:16 PM

Apr 2013

Or maybe you're sandbagging us, it's hard to tell.

State owned ranges? Oh, that would go over well with the libertarian set.

Good luck with your thread and welcome to DU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm new but there seems to be a lot of firearm threads , to all gun owners on the site [View all] newmember Apr 2013 OP

have a good one marions ghost Apr 2013 #1

I'm not sure what that means but it did make me laugh newmember Apr 2013 #3

. Indiana Apr 2013 #63

You're projecting your own rationality onto those who frighten and perplex you. leveymg Apr 2013 #2

thank for the welcome newmember Apr 2013 #10

Already are heavily restricted Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #12

Two people just had one in a restaurant, there's a thread about it right now newmember Apr 2013 #15

those require Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #20

The gun used in this incident ... Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #21

Reality check. 99Forever Apr 2013 #41

. Indiana Apr 2013 #66

Nice NRA strawman you've got there. 99Forever Apr 2013 #67

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #69

I believe we all have a right to self defense madville Apr 2013 #4

You aren't really conversant with firearms I suspect Fumesucker Apr 2013 #5

There are state run liquor stores newmember Apr 2013 #13

I don't think I've ever heard of 21st Amendment Absolut ists Fumesucker Apr 2013 #14

Are you required to store the alcohol in the state store when not drinking? Marengo Apr 2013 #48

Getting rid of handgun ownership would require getting rid of gun manufacturers. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #6

Actually I think there are a few that are long gun only ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #8

are you for real? Skittles Apr 2013 #18

I'm responding to the OP, the only way to get rid of handguns would be to close gun makers. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #23

who exactly is advocating "getting rid of handguns"? Skittles Apr 2013 #32

Uh...the OP, which is who I was responding to in the first place. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #34

it's called gun CONTROL Skittles Apr 2013 #36

You asked if I was "for real". JaneyVee Apr 2013 #43

jury is still out Skittles Apr 2013 #55

You make no sense. Thanks for wasting my time. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #71

Have all the bridges collapsed? Apophis Apr 2013 #7

LOL piedmont Apr 2013 #9

No sir not confiscation, newmember Apr 2013 #35

Automatic firearms ARE banned. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #45

Are you talking about handguns or automatic weapons? Pelican Apr 2013 #49

To answer your two questions... bluedigger Apr 2013 #11

Yes, this sounds much too draconian for me. Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #16

It would only be handguns stored at a range newmember Apr 2013 #22

Gun violence will never be eradicated in this country. The most we can wish for is LESS gun deaths. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #25

It doesn't make sense that any law abiding gun owner would oppose anything what you wrote. newmember Apr 2013 #27

The NRA does. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #28

Of course it does newmember. Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #31

What restriction? newmember Apr 2013 #37

Okay, let's start there. Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #50

"Would you restrict that" newmember Apr 2013 #58

My personal opinion? Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #60

The restriction... Pelican Apr 2013 #51

well Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #33

I didn't say anything about clips but have rifles that fire like this, or a shotgun in your home newmember Apr 2013 #46

The Winchester Model 70 has an internal spring fed ammunition well... Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #54

That's the firearm I described in my original post newmember Apr 2013 #59

So the fact that the weapon holds three to five rounds is okay? Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #61

No restrictions? Llewlladdwr Apr 2013 #29

Since you are new here Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #17

cowards do not understand common sense Skittles Apr 2013 #19

Who fears? The gun owner that sleeps with a gun/bullet under the pillow, in fear of boogiemen? graham4anything Apr 2013 #24

... spanone Apr 2013 #26

I support gun rights newmember Apr 2013 #30

As I stated before Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #39

yup Skittles Apr 2013 #40

Reply #1 sums it up nicely. Lasher Apr 2013 #62

OMG Skittles Apr 2013 #65

"Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?" sylvi Apr 2013 #38

Like those who insist that ANY legislation/regulation is an intolerable assault... pinboy3niner Apr 2013 #42

Well, we already have thousands upon thousands sylvi Apr 2013 #52

No, the question is how many more firearm casualties are we, as a society, willing to tolerate? pinboy3niner Apr 2013 #53

Both questions are valid, I think. sylvi Apr 2013 #57

As soon as you get the gangs and the criminals to do that, let me know. nt Skip Intro Apr 2013 #44

The current paradigm is the result of gun owners writing our gun laws. baldguy Apr 2013 #47

If I support common sense laws kudzu22 Apr 2013 #56

You have waded into one of the muckiest topics on DU. Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #64

Your post is normally considered flame bait lunatica Apr 2013 #68

And they can buy one bullet at a time. dems_rightnow Apr 2013 #70

Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #72