General Discussion

Fla_Democrat

(2,623 posts)

47. Why stop there?

Tue Apr 23, 2013, 09:05 PM

Apr 2013

Maybe we can interpenetrate the 3rd? Just in case there is another event like the Boston bombing. How much more efficient would it be, if instead of having police go door to door, the troops could just go back to where they are quartered?

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

In fact..... we don't even need that, it states right there... nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Since the War on Terrah* kicked off.. we are in a 'time of war'. All that needs to happen is a law get passed prescribing the particulars.

I think you may be on to** something.

* Deliberate spelling, live with it.

** Delete word as needed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is why NYC should be able to conduct border searches on everyone entering NYC [View all] graham4anything Apr 2013 OP

This is why graham4anything Apr 2013 #1

LOL.. pipoman Apr 2013 #2

Well, NYC LEOs probably have full machine guns, so why not "full gun machines?" Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #4

Some reason.. I don't think your main problem will be the NRA Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #5

Why? Guns are NOT allowed in. People sneaking them in are criminals. graham4anything Apr 2013 #8

You can't just search everybody's vehicle OwnedByCats Apr 2013 #19

You are becoming famous here. And not in a good way. onenote Apr 2013 #20

I believe the correct word is infamous... ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #26

Your ignorance of civil rights not to mention Federal law is astounding ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #25

You have totally mis-represented the amendment that was voted on. former9thward Apr 2013 #32

with all due respect that is disingenuous to the point of being dishonest dsc Apr 2013 #93

A completely false post. To get a TX ccw you have to be a legal resident of TX. former9thward Apr 2013 #98

and of course they would take the opportunity to balance their budget by selling dsc Apr 2013 #99

Now that you were caught giving out misinformation ... former9thward Apr 2013 #100

again I am sure the NRA wouldn't lobby to create such a ccw factory dsc Apr 2013 #101

Compared to Texas, NY has no standards. oneshooter Apr 2013 #102

The ACLU got Ollie North off, with that move, prevented any Iran/Contra look-see after. graham4anything Apr 2013 #11

The same. The ACLU that protects the 1st amendment rights of Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #16

It's so funny, now that people will want to reinterpret the 2nd, that the 4th keeps popping up. graham4anything Apr 2013 #42

Why stop there? Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #47

Quit thinking small sarisataka Apr 2013 #57

At least the trains would run on time.* Fla_Democrat Apr 2013 #62

its hard to tell sometimes if you are serious galileoreloaded Apr 2013 #14

same question the poster posted as #12. Almost word for word. graham4anything Apr 2013 #15

Don't you find it odd that a lot of DUers seem to be constantly perplexed by your posts? Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #17

The thread is about the OP, not me. Don't you agree NY/California should keep guns out? graham4anything Apr 2013 #34

I live in California. No I don't agree. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #54

So bad produce is more important than guns? There are checkpoints for produce & searches graham4anything Apr 2013 #55

Sometimes I wonder if you've ever driven across the NV or OR border into CA. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #67

And when the checkpoint on I-15 is open, premium Apr 2013 #71

But of course, if people think it is in place and 25% are checked graham4anything Apr 2013 #94

that was as logical as your OP. at least your consistent galileoreloaded Apr 2013 #18

The more you post... Demo_Chris Apr 2013 #81

... rrneck Apr 2013 #3

Papers please. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #6

Please stop for a quick pat down...LOLOL pipoman Apr 2013 #7

Are you admitting gun owners would not comply with law by not Hoyt Apr 2013 #63

You're so predictable Hoyt. premium Apr 2013 #64

LOL..only you pipoman Apr 2013 #66

Yep. Cause I know you guys when it comes to guns. Love you guys otherwise. Hoyt Apr 2013 #69

If my statement and picture pipoman Apr 2013 #75

I'd kind of hope you supposed law-abiding, responsible gun owners - - would act it. Hoyt Apr 2013 #76

So now you are stating I'm not a pipoman Apr 2013 #78

I know how you are with respect to guns because I've read your pro-gun Hoyt Apr 2013 #80

That's what I thought...flippant vile accusations then change the subject.. pipoman Apr 2013 #89

Seems to be his M.O. nt. premium Apr 2013 #90

Can the rest of us frisk everyone who leaves the city? tkmorris Apr 2013 #9

Escape from New York...its wasn't bad SciFi, its was prophecy!!! ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #29

Note reply #7 uses NRA tactic #234.56 the posting of a large pix in thread they don't like graham4anything Apr 2013 #10

you'e either a brilliant satirist, or a buffoon... dionysus Apr 2013 #88

there's a third alternative. I lean in that direction cali Apr 2013 #92

I lean in the direction... redgreenandblue Apr 2013 #96

It is so bad with you that I have no idea if you are serious or kidding most the time. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #12

Guns and bullets and other WMDs are not a laughing matter. graham4anything Apr 2013 #13

Gish Gallop blm Apr 2013 #24

Ishkabibble... Pelican Apr 2013 #79

Indeed, this is at least a local peak for him. ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #31

Surprise, surprise, another authoritarian proposal from you, MadHound Apr 2013 #21

knew it'd be you. nt RedCappedBandit Apr 2013 #22

No thank you I would prefer not Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #23

Actually, it wouldn't take any longer than it does now for those not attempting to smuggle graham4anything Apr 2013 #38

Ben Franklin also said Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #45

Permanent security trumps temporary. Guns/bullets are temporary. Another misinterpretation graham4anything Apr 2013 #46

Your not talking about permanent safety your speaking of temporary safety Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #50

80-20. Don't like Bush? Don't elect Jeb. It really is simple. graham4anything Apr 2013 #51

Yes you are breaking the law bringing them in and if caught they will be punished Arcanetrance Apr 2013 #53

This past week showed, most cops and firemen are great people.Get rid of all guns/all bad ones. graham4anything Apr 2013 #95

WTF are chareltons? As for everything else you said: Guy Whitey Corngood Apr 2013 #73

He's been arrested - LiberalElite Apr 2013 #27

Good. Hope the perp gets the Max. Any child could have found that gun. graham4anything Apr 2013 #35

knr - EXACTLY!! Only when the government controls everything everybody does will we be safe!! Douglas Carpenter Apr 2013 #28

your argument is lacking, well... everything a sound argument requires other than a weak premise LanternWaste Apr 2013 #30

Snake Plissken is *not* amused Fumesucker Apr 2013 #33

You know one day the 2nd will be reinterpreted and your guns will be gone. graham4anything Apr 2013 #36

Are you talking to me? Fumesucker Apr 2013 #39

This message was self-deleted by its author johnp3907 Apr 2013 #48

I heard he was dead. johnp3907 Apr 2013 #49

You are in violation of DU TOS. Dr. Strange Apr 2013 #65

I was studying the Second Amendent sarisataka Apr 2013 #37

Sounds to me there are indeed loopholes in the 2nd as holeladen as Swiss Cheese graham4anything Apr 2013 #40

Pass the butter, please JHB Apr 2013 #41

Good thinking! bluedigger Apr 2013 #43

Reinterpret the 2nd and the 4th. The 2nd takes away my 1st. graham4anything Apr 2013 #44

Aren't you living in the wrong country. premium Apr 2013 #61

You scare me. Texasgal Apr 2013 #52

I don't believe in anarchy. Look what a hacker did today with that phony tweet. graham4anything Apr 2013 #58

And you think that 'logic' explains away her fear instinct? pipoman Apr 2013 #87

doesn't seem like a very good reason for what you're arguing fishwax Apr 2013 #56

So is this idea just for guns or all illegal activity? SomethingFishy Apr 2013 #59

maybe they could put up a wall datasuspect Apr 2013 #60

Stupidest post I've read today. tammywammy Apr 2013 #68

Today? Bonobo Apr 2013 #70

I read something recently that was pretty stupid. tammywammy Apr 2013 #72

It deserves nomination for DU's Beer, Travel Money and Many Experiences Award pinboy3niner Apr 2013 #74

Beer and travel money aren't going to help much when you need an internal passport. JVS Apr 2013 #83

It is long past time that 'checkpoints' be established to pass from 'county to county' in this Purveyor Apr 2013 #77

Have you invested in property in New Jersey? JVS Apr 2013 #82

This is why NYC should be able to conduct border searches on everyone entering NYC... onpatrol98 Apr 2013 #84

No, no, premium Apr 2013 #86

yes indeed. See new thread. graham4anything Apr 2013 #105

They should start with you hobbit709 Apr 2013 #85

I think you've demonstrated that the anti-gun side has freaky, anti-civil liberty fringe just as aikoaiko Apr 2013 #91

I think I have to agree with you on that observation, oddly enough. nt Electric Monk Apr 2013 #97

Don't be too tough on G4a sylvi Apr 2013 #103

I was hoping for a new GrahamCrackers thread today, but... Bonobo Apr 2013 #104