Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Clothing Stores Be Required to Post [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)19. Carbon footprint of the textile industry
Textile manufacturing is a separate matter from apparel fabrication.
2% of the US workforce is engaged in textiles.
Remember, this includes lots of agriculture and lots and lots of synthetics (petroleum).
Carbon footprint of the textile industry
25 05 2009
Were starting a series of blogs on the carbon footprint of textiles. Because its such a complex subject were breaking it into smaller portions, beginning with looking at the textile industry as a whole. In other words, why the fuss over textiles?
Fabrics, believe it or not, have a large carbon footprint. In other words, it takes a lot of energy to produce fabrics. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. textile industry is the 5th largest contributor to CO2 emissioins in the United States (after primary metals, nonmetallic mineral products, petroleum and chemicals). In the developing world, where the textile industry represents a larger percentage of GDP and mills are often antiquated, the CO2 emissions are greater.
In fact, todays textile industry is one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gasses on Earth, due to the huge size and scope of the industry as well as the many processes and products that go into the making of textiles and finished textile products. (See Vivek Dev, Carbon Footprint of Textiles, April 3, 2009, http://www.domain-b.com/environment/20090403_carbon_footprint.html)
Based on estimated annual global textile production of 60 billion kilogrms (KG) 0f fabric, the estimated energy and water needed to produce that 60 billion KG of fabrics boggles the mind: 1,074 billion KWh of electricity (or 132 million metric tons of coal) and between 6 9 trillion liters of water.
http://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/category/carbon-footprint-2/page/2/
25 05 2009
Were starting a series of blogs on the carbon footprint of textiles. Because its such a complex subject were breaking it into smaller portions, beginning with looking at the textile industry as a whole. In other words, why the fuss over textiles?
Fabrics, believe it or not, have a large carbon footprint. In other words, it takes a lot of energy to produce fabrics. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. textile industry is the 5th largest contributor to CO2 emissioins in the United States (after primary metals, nonmetallic mineral products, petroleum and chemicals). In the developing world, where the textile industry represents a larger percentage of GDP and mills are often antiquated, the CO2 emissions are greater.
In fact, todays textile industry is one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gasses on Earth, due to the huge size and scope of the industry as well as the many processes and products that go into the making of textiles and finished textile products. (See Vivek Dev, Carbon Footprint of Textiles, April 3, 2009, http://www.domain-b.com/environment/20090403_carbon_footprint.html)
Based on estimated annual global textile production of 60 billion kilogrms (KG) 0f fabric, the estimated energy and water needed to produce that 60 billion KG of fabrics boggles the mind: 1,074 billion KWh of electricity (or 132 million metric tons of coal) and between 6 9 trillion liters of water.
http://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/category/carbon-footprint-2/page/2/
Also:
http://www.brighthub.com/environment/green-living/articles/73624.aspx
http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/textiles-industry-united-states
~~~~~~
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been in dozens of american garment factories, and none was ever that clean.
bettyellen
May 2013
#16
yep, filthy, dangerous and miserable places. most of the sewers were immigrants with
bettyellen
May 2013
#30
My first job in that environment was a similar... I was having trouble sketching
bettyellen
May 2013
#36
the building that fell down and killed 600 people was likely pretty clean and bright too. it was
HiPointDem
May 2013
#32
I'm sure it was not well kept like that pic. I don't appreciate you making light of this.
bettyellen
May 2013
#37
that was a nasty dose of sarcasm I "got" as did others here. A hint for you:
bettyellen
May 2013
#40
did you now? funny. there's no hint of my being 'appalled' & the only outrage appears to be
HiPointDem
May 2013
#41
just spare us your little lectures and look at the darned OP next time, okay?
bettyellen
May 2013
#42
I wasn't responding to the OP. and the OP was written in light of the event in bangladesh anyway.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#43
the building that fell down and killed 600 people was likely pretty clean and bright too.
HiPointDem
May 2013
#33
I think schools should have a sustainability and humanity curriculum at every grade level.
NYC_SKP
May 2013
#2
Schools don't even have Civics and gym classes any more, never mind music or art.
MADem
May 2013
#27
And ALEC is pushing legislation to prohibit it in American agribusiness as well.
bluedigger
May 2013
#10
That could be effective. If the following photo of free range turkeys was also displayed,
Nye Bevan
May 2013
#20