Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
19. Carbon footprint of the textile industry
Sun May 5, 2013, 12:43 PM
May 2013

Textile manufacturing is a separate matter from apparel fabrication.
2% of the US workforce is engaged in textiles.
Remember, this includes lots of agriculture and lots and lots of synthetics (petroleum).

Carbon footprint of the textile industry
25 05 2009

We’re starting a series of blogs on the carbon footprint of textiles. Because it’s such a complex subject we’re breaking it into smaller portions, beginning with looking at the textile industry as a whole. In other words, why the fuss over textiles?

Fabrics, believe it or not, have a large carbon footprint. In other words, it takes a lot of energy to produce fabrics. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. textile industry is the 5th largest contributor to CO2 emissioins in the United States (after primary metals, nonmetallic mineral products, petroleum and chemicals). In the developing world, where the textile industry represents a larger percentage of GDP and mills are often antiquated, the CO2 emissions are greater.

In fact, today’s textile industry is one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gasses on Earth, due to the huge size and scope of the industry as well as the many processes and products that go into the making of textiles and finished textile products. (See Vivek Dev, “Carbon Footprint of Textiles”, April 3, 2009, http://www.domain-b.com/environment/20090403_carbon_footprint.html)

Based on estimated annual global textile production of 60 billion kilogrms (KG) 0f fabric, the estimated energy and water needed to produce that 60 billion KG of fabrics boggles the mind: 1,074 billion KWh of electricity (or 132 million metric tons of coal) and between 6 – 9 trillion liters of water.

http://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/category/carbon-footprint-2/page/2/


Also:

http://www.brighthub.com/environment/green-living/articles/73624.aspx

http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/textiles-industry-united-states

~~~~~~

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here's an example of such a photo: MineralMan May 2013 #1
Am I supposed to look at that and think "OMG, that's horrible" Nye Bevan May 2013 #14
Exactly. Are there surprise audits? Ilsa May 2013 #23
The problem is also that we don't know the context fujiyama May 2013 #44
I've been in dozens of american garment factories, and none was ever that clean. bettyellen May 2013 #16
Haven't seen that many, but pipi_k May 2013 #29
yep, filthy, dangerous and miserable places. most of the sewers were immigrants with bettyellen May 2013 #30
One of the things that surprised me pipi_k May 2013 #34
My first job in that environment was a similar... I was having trouble sketching bettyellen May 2013 #36
the building that fell down and killed 600 people was likely pretty clean and bright too. it was HiPointDem May 2013 #32
I'm sure it was not well kept like that pic. I don't appreciate you making light of this. bettyellen May 2013 #37
you got all that from this? HiPointDem May 2013 #39
that was a nasty dose of sarcasm I "got" as did others here. A hint for you: bettyellen May 2013 #40
did you now? funny. there's no hint of my being 'appalled' & the only outrage appears to be HiPointDem May 2013 #41
just spare us your little lectures and look at the darned OP next time, okay? bettyellen May 2013 #42
I wasn't responding to the OP. and the OP was written in light of the event in bangladesh anyway. HiPointDem May 2013 #43
you were responding to posts critiquing pictures of factories. bettyellen May 2013 #45
That looks clean and bright from here. MADem May 2013 #26
the building that fell down and killed 600 people was likely pretty clean and bright too. HiPointDem May 2013 #33
Looks can be deceiving. MADem May 2013 #35
I think schools should have a sustainability and humanity curriculum at every grade level. NYC_SKP May 2013 #2
Another capital idea! MineralMan May 2013 #5
Schools don't even have Civics and gym classes any more, never mind music or art. MADem May 2013 #27
It's why my kid is at a Friends school. nt msanthrope May 2013 #28
Here's a toy factory, and an electronics factory: MineralMan May 2013 #3
It really translates to the whole "buy local" concept. bluedigger May 2013 #4
And I'm not even posting sweatshop photos. MineralMan May 2013 #7
And ALEC is pushing legislation to prohibit it in American agribusiness as well. bluedigger May 2013 #10
See "150 mile Wardrobe" NYC_SKP May 2013 #9
That is interesting. bluedigger May 2013 #15
Carbon footprint of the textile industry NYC_SKP May 2013 #19
...and here's one in New York... brooklynite May 2013 #6
Yes. That's the idea. Here's where your clothing is made, MineralMan May 2013 #8
By whom? Iggo May 2013 #17
Just post the photos and let people draw their own conclusions. MineralMan May 2013 #18
Wow. Iggo May 2013 #21
Here's a clue pipi_k May 2013 #31
And here's who is NOT making your goods: MineralMan May 2013 #11
I wouldn't trust them not to cherrypick the hell out of such photos. (nt) Posteritatis May 2013 #12
Here's a turkey farm photo for the supermarket: MineralMan May 2013 #13
That could be effective. If the following photo of free range turkeys was also displayed, Nye Bevan May 2013 #20
Free range heritage turkeys are the best. Luminous Animal May 2013 #24
And here's how it would work. Igel May 2013 #22
You're thinking of photos like these ones? Heywood J May 2013 #25
more than that PD Turk May 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Clothing Stores Be...»Reply #19