Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
7. Hop one step further from the link in the OP...
Mon May 6, 2013, 11:28 PM
May 2013

...to the link at the end of the article: See: Obama Administration: Big Pharma Worth More Than Lives of People in India:

There have been two major intellectual property cases in India since USTR's (U.S. Trade Representative’s) last Special 301 list. The first occurred last year, when the Indian government approved the development of an affordable generic alternative to Nexavar, an expensive cancer drug patented in India by the German drugmaker Bayer AG. Bayer was charging more than $5,000 a month for standard doses of the medication — unthinkable in a nation with a per capita income of about $1,410.

A generic version, approved by the Indian government, cost just $157 a month (NB: that's still $1884/year, $474 above per capita income). Under the compulsory license issued by the government, Bayer received a 6 percent royalty on sales of the generic drug.

USTR maintained a low public profile domestically during the hubub that ensued, but other Obama administration officials lashed out at the Indian government, accusing it of violating World Trade Organization treaties.

In a July 2012 hearing, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea called the decision an “egregious” WTO violation. “This is front and center,” she said. “[We are] trying to stop the granting of further compulsory licenses.”

Compulsory licensing — the granting of a license to produce a generic version of a product — is explicitly protected by WTO treaties to help countries improve public health and ensure access to medicines.

USTR referenced the Nexavar case in its Special 301 Report, objecting to the Indian government decision for saying the country’s law allows a compulsory license on products that are not being manufactured in India three years after they are patented. The India court’s decision, however, primarily focused on Bayer’s failure to meet demand for the medication and the firm’s failure to offer the drug at “reasonably affordable price.”

James Love, director of the nonprofit group Knowledge Ecology International, told HuffPost the Obama administration, by focusing on India’s domestic drug production rules, neglected to admit it was trying to force India to accept a $65,000 annual price for a cancer drug.


Spend a buck to make a buck,
You don't really give a flying fuck
About the people in misery.


Thanks for the post, mm.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bookmarking for second opinion, and b/c this is a new one to me. Thanks! nt babylonsister May 2013 #1
Heh, I love the quote you didn't have room to include... LooseWilly May 2013 #2
What do you know about your link? pscot May 2013 #3
They are caraher May 2013 #4
The disclaimer is not false. The Green Party does not sponsor this initiative. Luminous Animal May 2013 #12
The fact that the Green party presidential pscot May 2013 #17
Yes. Some people say. Luminous Animal May 2013 #20
I'm sure in legal terms there's no problem caraher May 2013 #26
India obviously has a superior medical care system FrodosPet May 2013 #5
Many Indian Docs were trained right here in the good ole USA >>> YOHABLO May 2013 #10
Did you see the show? At least the posted clip? FrodosPet May 2013 #15
Certainly the greediest pscot May 2013 #18
Nailed It! bvar22 May 2013 #24
and this has what to do with patenting drugs? La Lioness Priyanka May 2013 #29
Profit over People - thats our moto usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #6
Same could be said for India Mr. Blue Sky May 2013 #19
Right, our capitalist masters have 0 restraint now usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #22
Hop one step further from the link in the OP... DreamGypsy May 2013 #7
This makes me sick with fury KauaiK May 2013 #8
. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #9
oh my. Seems bad. nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #11
trade agreements. HiPointDem May 2013 #13
I believe this is probably an issue with GATT... ReRe May 2013 #14
2 sides to every story... Mr. Blue Sky May 2013 #16
Even if this side of the story is correct, I have no objection to protective trade practices. LiberalAndProud May 2013 #21
We would not be where we are today without them & usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #23
+200 Populist_Prole May 2013 #25
India and others who put the needs of their populations first instead of corporations stand a good indepat May 2013 #27
India and others who put the needs of their populations first ahead of corporations stand a good indepat May 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. punishes India for p...»Reply #7