Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: This is so sad, [View all]

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. Doctors would probably be much more generous with their time and work
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:25 AM
May 2013

if their education were not so terribly expensive. It takes a long, long, long time to become a qualified doctor. And then you face repaying your student loans and repeated examinations. It is not an easy life. The hours are long as it is.

I would not ask more of doctors than they are now giving us. We expect them to handle the responsibility of making life and death decisions every day without complaint.

Contrast that with the millionaires on Wall Street who think only of themselves. Even their charitable giving is for show and for the return on improving their images.

Should corporations help to pay for the damages to the victims of the Boston bombings. Yes. But we should try to do everything we can to eliminate the feelings of anger, fear, frustration and impatience that lead to things like the Boston bombings. And we should watch out and help our friends to overcome their depression and feelings of anger and desperation. Bombs and guns are not the answer. Never. Never. Never.

Asking doctors to donate their time? Yes. If they feel so moved. But not if they don't. Why not ask Wall Street brokers to donate their time? They could afford it even better than doctors.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is so sad, [View all] sheshe2 May 2013 OP
The fact that anyone has to pay anything is sad. MrSlayer May 2013 #1
**** NCarolinawoman May 2013 #2
Maybe Nader's voters in 2000 should have thought about it, instead of defiance & anti-parties graham4anything May 2013 #3
A new low for you. ForgoTheConsequence May 2013 #4
The response #1 to the OP is anti-corporation, anti-health care.it is political graham4anything May 2013 #6
None of this makes any sense. ForgoTheConsequence May 2013 #7
instead of adhoming me, read the response someone else wrote below.reply #5 graham4anything May 2013 #8
Doctors would probably be much more generous with their time and work JDPriestly May 2013 #23
There are 1000s of doctors worldwide who could replace those here and do so remembering graham4anything May 2013 #25
Doctors are exhausted. They work long hours, and when they come home, they study JDPriestly May 2013 #29
Most doctors today work for corporations. madaboutharry May 2013 #27
Please explain, graham. sheshe2 May 2013 #12
the response #1 to your op, to the article. Not to you personally.I edited to show that. graham4anything May 2013 #15
Thanks for clarifying, graham. sheshe2 May 2013 #18
+1. graham4anything May 2013 #19
Bullshit. Insurance is not care. Even after near-universal coverage in MA-- eridani May 2013 #22
Yeah, ok. MrSlayer May 2013 #11
NO lifetime cap is will be in 2014. The single most important item always overlooked in rants. graham4anything May 2013 #16
Medicare for All Summer Hathaway May 2013 #5
I don't disagree that the corporate media is…corporate. MrSlayer May 2013 #32
Sorry, but ... Summer Hathaway May 2013 #33
Wow. That's what you write in a thread which is about this: Bluenorthwest May 2013 #34
I was not responding to the OP Summer Hathaway May 2013 #35
+1000 Jamaal510 May 2013 #36
I'm sorry you're tired of hearing the truth. MrSlayer May 2013 #37
You might want to edit your response Summer Hathaway May 2013 #38
Typical. Can't refute the points so attack something meaningless. MrSlayer May 2013 #39
I didn't attack anything. Summer Hathaway May 2013 #40
Ditto marions ghost May 2013 #30
Very sad, she.. Cha May 2013 #9
Thanks Cha, sheshe2 May 2013 #13
Isn't it, Cha May 2013 #14
Actually the people who are living might need it more. dkf May 2013 #10
That's my thought. We cannot replace the dead. We cannot bring them back. JDPriestly May 2013 #24
Good.. it's on the Greatest so more Peeps can Cha May 2013 #17
Shouldn't the money be prioritized to the living? AtheistCrusader May 2013 #20
No one knows the whole story of their lives, sheshe2 May 2013 #26
And if we had "Canadian-style" health care, the only thing the money would do SoCalDem May 2013 #21
You put that well marions ghost May 2013 #31
KICK! n/t NCarolinawoman May 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is so sad,»Reply #23