Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)You want a scandal? Here’s a scandal. [View all]
You want a scandal? Heres a scandal.
By Jonathan Bernstein, Published: May 13, 2013 at 5:21
Want a real Washington scandal one worse than the (phony) Benghazi scandal and the (apparently real, but apparently limited) IRS scandals combined? Try the continuing, and possibly accelerating, obstruction of executive branch nominees by Senate Republicans.
Dont think its a scandal? Its pretty basic: Republicans, by abusing their Constitutional powers, are deliberately, in several cases preventing the government from carrying out duly passed laws.
The New York Times yesterday highlighted two of the more recent ways that Republicans have manipulated loopholes in Senate rules to delay confirmation of Secretary of Labor nominee Thomas Perez and Environmental Protection Agency nominee Gina McCarthy. Its worth stepping back and realizing: whats happening here is that Republicans are delaying these nominations beyond their eventual insistence that almost all nominees must get 60 votes. In other words, theyre filibustering on top of their own filibusters.
Thats just two examples. There are numerous others; again, with virtually all nominees required to have 60 votes, one can accurately say that Republicans are filibustering every nomination. But perhaps the worst are the nullification filibusters, in which Republicans simply refuse to approve any nominee at all for some positions the National Labor Relations Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau because they dont want those agencies to carry out their statutory obligations.
In doing so, Republicans are not breaking the rules of the Senate. They are, however, breaking the Senate itself, and harming the government. As with all legislative chambers, and in fact all democratic institutions, the Senate runs on a combination of formal rules and informal norms. But Republicans, by refusing to accept those norms, make it impossible for the normal machinery of government to function.
more...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/05/13/you-want-a-scandal-heres-a-scandal/
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yep. It's not about having more money than you could spend in many lifetimes.
maddiemom
May 2013
#42
Well, Texas Democrats TRIED to send Paul Sadler to the Senate instead of Ted Cruz...
derby378
May 2013
#2
The poster didnt even mention Sen Reid. But IMO Sen Reid must shoulder a good share of the blame.
rhett o rick
May 2013
#11
This will get no coverage since the hot off the press AP/DOJ scandal breaking . . .
SleeplessinSoCal
May 2013
#5
2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 VOTE! 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 VOTE!!
judesedit
May 2013
#10
Do you really believe the IRS and AP stories are "witch hunts" created by the rethugs?
SlimJimmy
May 2013
#24
I think malfeasance would be letting them off way too lenient for those assholes
davidpdx
May 2013
#33
Why aren't the Dems outraged about this and making lots of waves in the press and media?
Auntie Bush
May 2013
#22
If george bush lying us into a war that killed & maimed thousands of americans doesn't cause a
HiPointDem
May 2013
#28