Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:23 AM May 2013

London: a case study in the effectiveness of gun control. [View all]

London, England has a homicide rate of 1.1/100K. Recently, I was engaged in a discussion with some "pro-gun progressives" in which it came to light that there are no cities -- zero -- in the US that have a homicide rate that low. That's right: every single city in the US with a population of at least 250K has a higher homicide rate than London, one of the largest and most diverse cities in the world. And, in almost all cases, the homicide rate is much higher.


All cities in the US. Not just the usual suspects, like New Orleans, which has a homicide rate of over 50X (fifty times!) higher than London. But also places you don't really associate with violence. For example, Portland OR, and Virginia Beach, VA both have over 3X as much homicide as London.

Virginia Beach! The homicide rate here

is three times higher than here!


Austin, Anchorage, Corpus Christi, Mesa AZ, all have between 3X and 4X as much homicide as London. Colorado Springs and Albuquerque, over 5X. Mobile AL and Tulsa OK, over 10X. And the list goes on.

Why would this be? Well, the NRA likes to blame anything except for guns, but the problem is, London has all of the other causes that the NRA likes to point to, and they have them in spades.

For example, NRAers like to claim that homicide is basically due to inner city gangs (which is, of course, false -- only about 12% of homicides in the US are gang related). But London has tons of gangs. NRAers like to point to ethnic tensions, or some of them put it, "black people". London has enormous ethnic tensions. Not only do they have black people, but they have tensions involving Muslims, and Eastern Europeans, Asians, etc. They have Bangladeshi gangs! Really!

London has poverty. London has crime. London has all of the social ills that go along with large, diverse, densely populated cities. And yet their homicide rate is tiny, compared to any city in the US.

Why? Because the gun laws in the UK are very tight. You might get robbed, but the person robbing you won't have a gun. People get into fights, but they don't shoot each other. And crimes involving guns are many times more likely to result in a homicide than crimes without guns.

Want to save lives in America, and get the homicide rate down in line with international standards? Gun control.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So repeal the 2nd Amendment already. badtoworse May 2013 #1
What were the homicide rates before gun bans? Eleanors38 May 2013 #2
The most recent major tightening of gun laws in the UK was in 1997. DanTex May 2013 #4
which is a real testement to Londoners! zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #17
Britain has always been pretty tightly regulated visavis guns,. truebluegreen May 2013 #5
There are also a few other before/after case studies to look at. DanTex May 2013 #6
But how will Londoners fight back when the Queen takes away their rights? mainer May 2013 #3
Respectfully, premium May 2013 #7
The only way to get change is to challenge the status quo. DanTex May 2013 #8
That may be, premium May 2013 #9
I agree with you there. DanTex May 2013 #10
Hopefully we'll get there with UBC soon, premium May 2013 #12
It is pretty close to the truth. Democracyinkind May 2013 #11
True, premium May 2013 #14
Granted, agree. nt. Democracyinkind May 2013 #21
At least the US trend is fewer families have guns mainer May 2013 #18
Not quite sure if that's true, premium May 2013 #19
There Is A Way To Do It ChoppinBroccoli May 2013 #20
I agree, premium May 2013 #22
People need to decide human life has value BainsBane May 2013 #30
While I generally agree with you, premium May 2013 #33
I agree BainsBane May 2013 #35
They have a high amount of stabbings though..and you can always get a gun fairly easy HipChick May 2013 #13
Stabbings are much less lethal than shootings. Part of why the homicide rate is so low. DanTex May 2013 #15
True, very true. premium May 2013 #16
Say, that's pretty good! rrneck May 2013 #23
Is it just guns or does violence matter? sarisataka May 2013 #24
Exactly. Despite higher general levels of violent crime, the UK has far less murder. DanTex May 2013 #25
we may agree and disagree at the same time sarisataka May 2013 #26
I'm not arguing that the UK is overall a better place to live. DanTex May 2013 #27
London has a higher violent crime rate than *any* US city on your list. SlipperySlope May 2013 #28
That's not accurate. DanTex May 2013 #29
This is the Wiki data I am citing... SlipperySlope May 2013 #31
It's not clear that "violence against the person" as measured in the UK is at all the same thing DanTex May 2013 #34
ooookay. sibelian May 2013 #36
Consequences are a valid topic of discussion. SlipperySlope May 2013 #37
That's all very interesting, but it's not really the subject under discussion, is it? sibelian May 2013 #38
There is no mechanism whereby reducing guns would increase homicide rates. DanTex May 2013 #39
U.S. owners don't want to save lives. They want reduce SS expenditures. Dead is better for them. nt valerief May 2013 #32
Rising now, was lowest around early-mid 20th century One_Life_To_Give May 2013 #40
Yes, the gun culture in the US probably has something to do with it. DanTex May 2013 #41
Thank you so much for your posts on ths subject etherealtruth May 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»London: a case study in t...