Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

2. Guess what

Reply to Logical (Reply #1)

Wed May 15, 2013, 08:39 PM

May 2013

Most people would have titled this post......

"The seizure of AP's phone records is legal, but that doesn't make it an acceptable"

only you would title it

"The seizure of AP's phone records is legal"

...the title of the OP doesn't change the fact that the action was legal, but that doesn't mean that you have to find the title "acceptable."

You're feigning laughter (to hide disappointment) that the action was legal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"The seizure of AP's phone records is legal" [View all] ProSense May 2013 OP

LOL...... Logical May 2013 #1

Guess what ProSense May 2013 #2

Fine with it being legal. But your misleading title is more proof of, well you know what. n-t Logical May 2013 #3

'Misleading'? Huh? randome May 2013 #4

"Fine with it being legal." ProSense May 2013 #6

Wait, ProSense May 2013 #5

You cut it off only to show the legal part, not the doesn't make it an acceptable part, and.... Logical May 2013 #9

WTF? ProSense May 2013 #13

Are you disputing the "doesn't make it an acceptable" part? If not then why not include it? You... Logical May 2013 #15

Because ProSense May 2013 #16

LOL, not accurate but makes your point I guess. You have PLENTY of room! Just add the.... Logical May 2013 #17

Yes, ProSense May 2013 #18

You posted a misleading title on purpose. And refuse to change it. Totally your right but.... Logical May 2013 #19

Yup, I posted it. Enjoy! n/t ProSense May 2013 #20

I posted their current stance on this incident. With an accurate title. Here you go.... Logical May 2013 #21

Cool, this is ProSense May 2013 #23

LOL, many things Bush did was legal also. I guess that makes it OK with you. n-t Logical May 2013 #24

Flashback ProSense May 2013 #25

Whats this have to do with your misleading post title? n-t Logical May 2013 #26

Why you don't like the title of the other thread either? n/t ProSense May 2013 #27

you would impeach Obama if you could. just like Rand Paul. MjolnirTime May 2013 #34

You are a liar, I would not! But Obama has made mistakes! n-t Logical May 2013 #40

One DU poster is falling all over himself to show that it isn't. But I have yet to read one good bluestate10 May 2013 #7

Well if you've put the fear of God in whistle blowers and sources you don't need to tap anyone. dkf May 2013 #8

Bullshit. ProSense May 2013 #11

If you are only aiming at 1 story you don't need 20 phone lines over 2 months reaching 100+ dkf May 2013 #14

And don't forget they were to tell the AP about BEFORE they did it. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #43

I agree Harmony Blue May 2013 #30

+1. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #41

... Matariki May 2013 #10

You add nothing but an ignorant insult. so cute with your little cheerleading Cha May 2013 #31

right Matariki May 2013 #47

Legal ? SamKnause May 2013 #12

That's a mighty big freaking broad brush you got there and Cha May 2013 #32

No kidding... Harmony Blue May 2013 #37

Congress needs to get off their asses and repeal the statute... kentuck May 2013 #22

Um, what? nt Deep13 May 2013 #28

Maybe this will help. ProSense May 2013 #29

Happy to have been the 5th Rec.. Cha May 2013 #33

i guessed the OP's name before i saw it nt markiv May 2013 #35

BFD. Cha May 2013 #45

It is. Unfortunately, it is. Thanks, Patriot Act... Taverner May 2013 #36

Its legality has nothing to do with the John Ashcroft's Patriot Act. n/t ProSense May 2013 #38

Warrentless Wiretapping. Taverner May 2013 #39

That has nothing to do with the AP case. n/t ProSense May 2013 #44

DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2013 #42

Kick! n/t ProSense May 2013 #46