Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Taverner

(55,476 posts)

39. Warrentless Wiretapping.

Reply to ProSense (Reply #38)

Wed May 15, 2013, 10:50 PM

May 2013

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in_the_United_States

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"The seizure of AP's phone records is legal" [View all] ProSense May 2013 OP

LOL...... Logical May 2013 #1

Guess what ProSense May 2013 #2

Fine with it being legal. But your misleading title is more proof of, well you know what. n-t Logical May 2013 #3

'Misleading'? Huh? randome May 2013 #4

"Fine with it being legal." ProSense May 2013 #6

Wait, ProSense May 2013 #5

You cut it off only to show the legal part, not the doesn't make it an acceptable part, and.... Logical May 2013 #9

WTF? ProSense May 2013 #13

Are you disputing the "doesn't make it an acceptable" part? If not then why not include it? You... Logical May 2013 #15

Because ProSense May 2013 #16

LOL, not accurate but makes your point I guess. You have PLENTY of room! Just add the.... Logical May 2013 #17

Yes, ProSense May 2013 #18

You posted a misleading title on purpose. And refuse to change it. Totally your right but.... Logical May 2013 #19

Yup, I posted it. Enjoy! n/t ProSense May 2013 #20

I posted their current stance on this incident. With an accurate title. Here you go.... Logical May 2013 #21

Cool, this is ProSense May 2013 #23

LOL, many things Bush did was legal also. I guess that makes it OK with you. n-t Logical May 2013 #24

Flashback ProSense May 2013 #25

Whats this have to do with your misleading post title? n-t Logical May 2013 #26

Why you don't like the title of the other thread either? n/t ProSense May 2013 #27

you would impeach Obama if you could. just like Rand Paul. MjolnirTime May 2013 #34

You are a liar, I would not! But Obama has made mistakes! n-t Logical May 2013 #40

One DU poster is falling all over himself to show that it isn't. But I have yet to read one good bluestate10 May 2013 #7

Well if you've put the fear of God in whistle blowers and sources you don't need to tap anyone. dkf May 2013 #8

Bullshit. ProSense May 2013 #11

If you are only aiming at 1 story you don't need 20 phone lines over 2 months reaching 100+ dkf May 2013 #14

And don't forget they were to tell the AP about BEFORE they did it. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #43

I agree Harmony Blue May 2013 #30

+1. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #41

... Matariki May 2013 #10

You add nothing but an ignorant insult. so cute with your little cheerleading Cha May 2013 #31

right Matariki May 2013 #47

Legal ? SamKnause May 2013 #12

That's a mighty big freaking broad brush you got there and Cha May 2013 #32

No kidding... Harmony Blue May 2013 #37

Congress needs to get off their asses and repeal the statute... kentuck May 2013 #22

Um, what? nt Deep13 May 2013 #28

Maybe this will help. ProSense May 2013 #29

Happy to have been the 5th Rec.. Cha May 2013 #33

i guessed the OP's name before i saw it nt markiv May 2013 #35

BFD. Cha May 2013 #45

It is. Unfortunately, it is. Thanks, Patriot Act... Taverner May 2013 #36

Its legality has nothing to do with the John Ashcroft's Patriot Act. n/t ProSense May 2013 #38

Warrentless Wiretapping. Taverner May 2013 #39

That has nothing to do with the AP case. n/t ProSense May 2013 #44

DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2013 #42

Kick! n/t ProSense May 2013 #46