General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Celebrities with their Pit Bulls [View all]ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Here's a recent article from the New York Times.
..................................
Can the Bulldog Be Saved?
Broadcast on the BBC, Exposed spawned three independent reports into purebred breeding, each finding that some modern breeding practices including inbreeding and breeding for extreme traits, like the massive and short-faced head of the bulldog are detrimental to the health and welfare of dogs. Bulldogs were noted in all three reports as a breed in need of an intervention, with one going so far as to question whether it is ethically defensible to continue breeding them at all.
There is little doubt that the anatomy of the English bulldog has considerable capacity to cause suffering, Dr. Nicola Rooney and Dr. David Sargan concluded in one of the reports, Pedigree Dog Breeding in the U.K.: A Major Welfare Concern? The breed is noted to have locomotion difficulties, breathing problems, an inability to mate or give birth without assistance. . . . Many would question whether the breeds quality of life is so compromised that its breeding should be banned.
In the United States, some veterinarians, breeders and animal-welfare experts are beginning to wonder the same thing. Last spring, the Humane Society organized its first conference on the topic of purebred-dog health and welfare. The societys chief executive, Wayne Pacelle, told me the conference signaled the beginning of a new era for his organization, which until recently has been focused on what he calls more obvious forms of animal cruelty. Inbreeding and other reckless breeding practices may not be as bloody as dogfighting or as painful to look at as puppy mills, but they may ultimately cause even more harm to the well-being of dogs, he said.
............................................................
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/magazine/can-the-bulldog-be-saved.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0