General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Celebrities with their Pit Bulls [View all]BREMPRO
(2,345 posts)conclusion of the inherent dangers of the breed. they also are more likely to bite children unprovoked and hard to get to let go during a bite given their breeding. I've witnessed this myself personally.. a child in a park i visited almost died from an unprovoked bite by a pitt bull breed, after being unable to pry the dog fromt he child it took 20+ hits to the head with a baseball bat to get the dog to let go.. (agreed not the best method, but the only one my friend had available at the time)
from wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull
Pit bull
A 9-year (197988) review of fatal dog attacks in the United States determined that, of the 101 attacks in which breed was recorded, pit bulls were implicated in 42 of those attacks (42%).[26] A 1991 study found that 94% of attacks on children by pit bulls were unprovoked, compared to 43% for other breeds.[27] A 5-year (198994) review of fatal dog attacks in the U.S. determined that pit bulls and pit bull mixed breeds were implicated in 24 (29%) of the 84 deaths in which breed was recorded.[28]
A 15-year (19912005) review of dog attack fatalities investigated by the Kentucky Medical Examiner determined that pit bulls were implicated in 5 of the 11 fatal attacks (45%).[29] Another 15-year (19942009) review of patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center with dog bites determined that pit bulls were most often involved in these attacks: of the 228 patients treated, the breed of dog was recorded in 82 attacks, and of these, 29 (35%) of the attacks were by pit bulls (all other dogs combined accounted for the remaining 65% of attacks).[30] In 45% of the attacks, the dog belonged to the victim's family.[30] The authors wrote:
Attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites.[30]
However, concerns about the reliability of the study's data, its conclusions, its methodology, and its use of citations were raised in a later letter to the editor of Annals of Surgery, by Karen Delise, founder of the National Canine Research Council, a pit bull advocacy organization.[31]
A 5-year (200105) review of dog attack victims admitted to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia determined that pit bull terriers were implicated in more than half of the bites where breed was identified. Of the 269 patients where breed was identified, 137 (51%) were attacked by pit bulls.[32] The authors wrote:
the overwhelming number of bites involving pit bull terriers in this study and others certainly has some degree of validity when it comes to identifying bite-prone breeds. Pit bull terriers, German shepherds, and Rottweilers were the offending breeds implicated in our study, and have accounted for the majority of dog bites according to other investigators.[32]
A review of the medical literature found that pit bulls and pit bull cross-breeds were involved in 4245% of dog attacks.[33] Fatalities were most often reported when children were attacked, with 70% of victims being under the age of 10.[33]
Some other studies on the number of human deaths caused by dog bite trauma have surveyed news media stories for reports of dog-bite-related fatalities. This methodology is subject to potential errors, as some fatal attacks may not have been reported, a study might not find all relevant news reports, and the dog breed might be misidentified.[6]
Courts in the United States[34][35] and Canada[36][37] have ruled that expert identification, when using published breed standards, is sufficient for the enforcement of breed-specific legislation. It is also possible to distinguish dogs by breed using DNA testing,[37] though test results for any one dog can vary widely depending upon the laboratory that performs the test and the number of purebred dog breeds in the laboratory's DNA database.[38]