Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Before Receiving Federal Disaster Aid- Red State Residents Should View Footage Of Their Reps [View all]Squinch
(59,295 posts)50. There are no strings attached. We will fight for their receipt of the aid. I don't think it's mean
to point out that we'd appreciate if they would do the same the next time the shoe is on the other foot. As they did NOT the last time the shoe was on the other foot. I just don't see that as mean, or vengeful, or a problem.
If we are neighbors, and I need to borrow your weed whacker you say no, and then you come to me and need to borrow my hedge clipper and I say, "Of course you can borrow my hedgeclipper, and you are welcomed to it. But I'd like you to remember that the next time I need to borrow the weedwhacker" I don't see that as vengeful or mean. I see that as making a point in the nicest way possible. We are INSISTING that they should be getting the aid they need. And we are saying, so should everyone else.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Before Receiving Federal Disaster Aid- Red State Residents Should View Footage Of Their Reps [View all]
KittyWampus
May 2013
OP
That's not an eye for an eye. That's "this is what we are absolutely going to do for you
Squinch
May 2013
#40
I said specifically NOT WITHHOLDING AID. What part of that don't you understand?
KittyWampus
May 2013
#53
So that the actions of the representatives that they elect can be understood in context.
Squinch
May 2013
#41
I suspect the actual plan was hyperbole. But I think it is perfectly legitimate
Squinch
May 2013
#44
There are no strings attached. We will fight for their receipt of the aid. I don't think it's mean
Squinch
May 2013
#50
You go doing things like this, you will make them vote them back in spite!
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#11
Frightening is the fact that most Dems do not realize Repubs play politics like a blood sport
LonePirate
May 2013
#32
This is a fact. Those guys from OK worked hard to prevent aid from getting to disaster victims.
Squinch
May 2013
#48
No. It's the opposite. It's "we will help you out whether or not you think like we do.
Squinch
May 2013
#43
This isn't shaming. This is pointing to a fact. Nothing to do with shaming. Those guys
Squinch
May 2013
#46
As I said upthread, I took that as hyperbole. BUt I wouldn't be averse to seeing a
Squinch
May 2013
#51
Wow! That would be a great idea... if the folks receiving aid still had televisions
winter is coming
May 2013
#4