Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Harry Reid escalates `nuclear’ threat [View all]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/05/22/harry-reid-escalates-nuclear-threat/Harry Reid escalates `nuclear threat
By Greg Sargent, Published: May 22, 2013 at 4:02
Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell have been slugging it out on the Senate floor today over Reids threat to revisit filibuster reform, and the escalating tone suggests this is now very real. Pay close attention to the statement Reid released today about their exchange:
Today, Senator McConnell defended the status quo of gridlock and obstruction in Washington, saying there is no real problem here. I could not disagree more. Senator McConnell may choose to ignore it, but the problem of gridlock in Washington is real and it needs to be fixed.
Presidents be they Republican or Democratic deserve to have the people working for them that they choose. The Senates role is to advise and consent. But Republicans have corrupted the Founders intent, creating an unreasonable and unworkable standard whereby the weakest of rationales is often cited as sufficient basis for blocking major nominees. Due to Republican obstruction, the de facto threshold for too many nominees to be confirmed has risen from a simple majority to a supermajority of 60 votes. On judicial nominees, Republicans obstruction is equally unprecedented There is no reason to delay qualified nominees for so long except delay itself, and it is little wonder we have a judicial vacancy crisis in this country.
Despite the agreement we reached in January, Republican obstruction on nominees continues unabated. I want to make the Senate work again that is my commitment.
Presidents be they Republican or Democratic deserve to have the people working for them that they choose. The Senates role is to advise and consent. But Republicans have corrupted the Founders intent, creating an unreasonable and unworkable standard whereby the weakest of rationales is often cited as sufficient basis for blocking major nominees. Due to Republican obstruction, the de facto threshold for too many nominees to be confirmed has risen from a simple majority to a supermajority of 60 votes. On judicial nominees, Republicans obstruction is equally unprecedented There is no reason to delay qualified nominees for so long except delay itself, and it is little wonder we have a judicial vacancy crisis in this country.
Despite the agreement we reached in January, Republican obstruction on nominees continues unabated. I want to make the Senate work again that is my commitment.
This statement is wholly focused on GOP obstruction of judicial and executive branch nominations. It excoriates the current GOP-created 60-vote threshold for nominees as unacceptable, and pledges to do something about it.
snip//
Indeed, as Sahil Kapur notes, if the GOP blocks those nominations, the pressure on Reid to press the button will get very intense indeed. Major Democratic constituencies (labor, environmentalists) have a big stake in these nominees, and the consumer protection bureau represents a major component of one of Obamas signature domestic initiatives Wall Street reform.
By the way, all of this could have very far reaching implications indeed. As Jonathan Chait notes today, Obama and Republicans are headed for a major showdown over climate change this summer, one focused on his pending plan to curb carbon emissions from existing power plants. And the battle could unfold in the D.C. Circuit Court, where Obama has not yet filled vacancies. Republicans will filibuster any efforts to do that.
At any rate, given todays public statements from Reid, if the current level of GOP obstructionism continues, its hard to see how he has room to not make good on his threat to hit that button.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whats the point? Once you open that door, the Republicans will use it next time they are in power.
TampaAnimusVortex
May 2013
#15
like repubs give a crap about what dems think/want. only dems grovel to their opposition nt
msongs
May 2013
#16
If we changed the rules it would mean the Republicans can't filibuster everything.
Dragonfli
May 2013
#20
The point that you miss is, when we are in the minority we don't use the filibuster
Dragonfli
May 2013
#32
What are you talking about? Prior to Obama, it was used by Ds all the time...
TampaAnimusVortex
May 2013
#35
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-pleads-fifth-republicans-hysterical.html
wilsonbooks
May 2013
#18