Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The legacy of Andrew Wakefield continues [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)10. AOA Weekly Wrap: Gag Me
http://www.ageofautism.com/2013/05/weekly-wrap-gag-me.html
Weekly Wrap: Gag Me
By Dan Olmsted
There's a moment in the 1950 movie Born Yesterday where the malaprop-prone Judy Holliday says, "This country and its institutions belong to the people who inhibit it." I'm starting to think Judy got that exactly right.
It's hard to conclude otherwise after this week's Columbia Journalism Review piece that singled out me and AOA (flattered, to tell you the truth), and said we were mangy dogs, all right, but that even balanced coverage of the vaccine-autism debate is, effectively, killing babies. It reminds me of the time after 9/11. If you criticized the invasion of Iraq, the terrorists win. If you didn't go shopping, the terrorists win.
Why not just root for the terrorists since about anything you did or didn't do would help them win? It's more straightforward that way.
Nowadays, if you echo, let's say, Darrell Issa or Elijah Cummings or the late great Bernadine Healy, not to mention Andy Wakefield, and ask questions about vaccines and autism or even, apparently, quote those people disapprovingly, the babykillers win. Perhaps the most exotic babykiller allegation I came across was the idea that Susan Dominus's whack job on Andy Wakefield in The New York Times shouldn't have been published either -- even viciously anti-anti-vaccine attack pieces kill babies by continuing to bring up the subject.
Seriously, they do! Paul Raeburn said so on the Knight Journalism at MIT blog in 2011:
So, even if you write a story attacking Andy Wakefield, children will suffer or die. Actually, I kind of like the ultimate extension of this logic. Since doing anything at all on this topic will cause children to suffer and die, I'm just going to keep on defending Andy Wakefield as a good man who did good science. I'm going to keep saying that vaccines triggered the autism epidemic.
What difference does it make?
Speaking of which, next Saturday at Autism One, we're unveiling a new nine-minute video, How Mercury Triggered the Age of Autism, that we very much hope will go as viral as a cat in a teacup or Kony 2012. Please, see it, share it, and let's stop the autism epidemic that thimerosal, the MMR, too many vaccines too soon and God knows what other insanities inside the CDC immunization schedule are causing.
There, I said it. Because if we don't, babies will suffer or die.
--
Dan Olmsted is Editor of Age of Autism.
Posted by Age of Autism at May 18, 2013 at 5:50 AM
Weekly Wrap: Gag Me
By Dan Olmsted
There's a moment in the 1950 movie Born Yesterday where the malaprop-prone Judy Holliday says, "This country and its institutions belong to the people who inhibit it." I'm starting to think Judy got that exactly right.
It's hard to conclude otherwise after this week's Columbia Journalism Review piece that singled out me and AOA (flattered, to tell you the truth), and said we were mangy dogs, all right, but that even balanced coverage of the vaccine-autism debate is, effectively, killing babies. It reminds me of the time after 9/11. If you criticized the invasion of Iraq, the terrorists win. If you didn't go shopping, the terrorists win.
Why not just root for the terrorists since about anything you did or didn't do would help them win? It's more straightforward that way.
Nowadays, if you echo, let's say, Darrell Issa or Elijah Cummings or the late great Bernadine Healy, not to mention Andy Wakefield, and ask questions about vaccines and autism or even, apparently, quote those people disapprovingly, the babykillers win. Perhaps the most exotic babykiller allegation I came across was the idea that Susan Dominus's whack job on Andy Wakefield in The New York Times shouldn't have been published either -- even viciously anti-anti-vaccine attack pieces kill babies by continuing to bring up the subject.
Seriously, they do! Paul Raeburn said so on the Knight Journalism at MIT blog in 2011:
"So why would the Times do this story now?
"Here's why not to do it: I believe that this story will prompt more parents to refuse to vaccinate their children. Some of those children will suffer or die from illnesses that the vaccines would have prevented.
"Stories have consequences, and it's often difficult to predict what those might be. I could be wrong about this. But I would have stayed far, far away from this story."
So, even if you write a story attacking Andy Wakefield, children will suffer or die. Actually, I kind of like the ultimate extension of this logic. Since doing anything at all on this topic will cause children to suffer and die, I'm just going to keep on defending Andy Wakefield as a good man who did good science. I'm going to keep saying that vaccines triggered the autism epidemic.
What difference does it make?
Speaking of which, next Saturday at Autism One, we're unveiling a new nine-minute video, How Mercury Triggered the Age of Autism, that we very much hope will go as viral as a cat in a teacup or Kony 2012. Please, see it, share it, and let's stop the autism epidemic that thimerosal, the MMR, too many vaccines too soon and God knows what other insanities inside the CDC immunization schedule are causing.
There, I said it. Because if we don't, babies will suffer or die.
--
Dan Olmsted is Editor of Age of Autism.
Posted by Age of Autism at May 18, 2013 at 5:50 AM
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Amen. My local austism society chapter invited this jerk to speak AFTER his license
Butterbean
May 2013
#17
"Trifles make perfection (or science), but perfection is no trifle." - Michelangelo
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#16
Ignore them, read their links to UK NHS data and reach your own conclusions.
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#21
When your kid is diagnosed with autism, you grasp onto any simple explanation
Canuckistanian
May 2013
#24
Uh, no, straw man fallacies beginning with the unflawed studies paragraph. nt
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#25
Smear away. You still haven't shown even once where I was wrong about the BFEE. Not even once.
Octafish
May 2013
#31
No. I didn't write that. Yet, you insist on associating me with something I did not write.
Octafish
May 2013
#34
I've read the stat that 1 in 8 children of Somali immigrants in Minnesota are diagnosed with autism.
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#38
KARE 11 TV Minneapolis: “1 in 8 kids in the local Somali community are affected” (VIDEO)
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#53
This speaks for itself in correcting a few of the misrepresentations on this thread.
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#39
AOA is an INTERMEDIARY between primary peer-reviewed material and the public vetted by SMART parents
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#43
New study by Dr. Martha Herbert & Dr. Julie Buckley in Journal of Child Neurology on autism and diet
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#44
Absolutely misleading, if true factoid, and the Journal of Child Neurology is peer-reviewed.
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#48
"Nothing of value in terms of original work or trying to interpret results from other places," oh?
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#49
Wakefield lost his medical license for using kids as subjects with "callous disregard"
Hekate
May 2013
#52
In the '60s I knew a girl who'd had mumps encephalitis. She was blind and crippled.
Hekate
May 2013
#54
Check it out, please. Video features GR Executive Director Candace McDonald and her brother.
proverbialwisdom
May 2013
#62