Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In Case You Missed This... And... Thank You Eugene Robinson - WaPo [View all]
Obama administration mistakes journalism for espionageEugene Robinson - WaPo
May 20, 2013
<snip>
The Obama administration has no business rummaging through journalists phone records, perusing their e-mails and tracking their movements in an attempt to keep them from gathering news. This heavy-handed business isnt chilling, its just plain cold.
It also may well be unconstitutional. In my reading, the First Amendment prohibition against abridging the freedom . . . of the press should rule out secretly obtaining two months worth of the personal and professional phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors, including calls to and from the main AP phone number at the House press gallery in the Capitol. Yet this is what the Justice Department did.
The unwarranted snooping, which was revealed last week, would be troubling enough if it were an isolated incident. But it is part of a pattern that threatens to redefine investigative reporting as criminal behavior.
And this...
If this had been the view of prior administrations, surely Bob Woodward would be a lifer in some federal prison. The cell next door might be occupied by my Post colleague Dana Priest, who disclosed the CIAs network of secret prisons. Or by the New York Times James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, who revealed the National Security Agencys eavesdropping program.
<snip>
More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene-robinson-obama-administration-mistakes-news-for-espionage/2013/05/20/0cf398e8-c17e-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_story.html
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heh. I was wondering if you'd seen that Atlantic piece. Puts everything in perspective.
Number23
May 2013
#31
You Said... "fact-free and hilarious"... REALLY... You Think The Diminution Of The 1st Amendment Is
WillyT
May 2013
#8
You Did That Already... I Got It The First Time... Why Are You Hijacking This Thread ???
WillyT
May 2013
#18
I am frankly shocked that Prosense would link to the "Corpsenews" thread,
woo me with science
May 2013
#35
I don't give a tinkers dam who is in the Whitehouse or whose side Fox is on....
Swamp Lover
May 2013
#24
If you are not interested in supporting civil liberties that protect their side as well as ours...
Swamp Lover
May 2013
#30
All of that may be true. And, for all we know the whole thing could have been a Rove plot
sabrina 1
May 2013
#43
Actually the part about Bob Woodward being a lifer in federal prison sort of appeals to me
tularetom
May 2013
#27