Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This... And... Thank You Eugene Robinson - WaPo [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. It couldn't
"He's right. It is a pattern. And all the excuse-making we're seeing would simply not occur outside of a transparent motive to defend this administration. This selective crackdown on unsanctioned leaks (and only on the unscanctioned ones) started under Bush, and it's getting worse. This is how government becomes opaque and unaccountable to the citizens."
...possibly be that the media are defending their own and those jumping on the bandwagon refuse to acknowleged the facts.
Stop the Leaks
By WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMIE S. GORELICK and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
<...>
As former Justice Department officials who served in the three administrations preceding President Obamas, we are worried that the criticism of the decision to subpoena telephone toll records of A.P. journalists in an important leak investigation sends the wrong message to the government officials who are responsible for our national security.
While neither we nor the critics know the circumstances behind the prosecutors decision to issue this subpoena, we do know from the governments public disclosures that the prosecutors were right to investigate this leak vigorously. The leak which resulted in a May 2012 article by The A.P. about the disruption of a Yemen-based terrorist plot to bomb an airliner significantly damaged our national security.
<...>
At the time the article was published, there were strong bipartisan calls for the Justice Department to find the leaker. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. gave that assignment to Ronald C. Machen Jr., the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, who is known for his meticulous and dedicated work. Importantly, his assignment was to identify and prosecute the government official who leaked the sensitive information; it was not to conduct an inquiry into the news organization that published it.
His office, which has an experienced national security team, undertook a methodical and measured investigation. Did prosecutors immediately seek the reporters toll records? No. Did they subpoena the reporters to testify or compel them to turn over their notes? No. Rather, according to the Justice Departments May 14 letter to The A.P., they first interviewed 550 people, presumably those who knew or might have known about the agent, and scoured the documentary record. But after eight months of intensive effort, it appears that they still could not identify the leaker...after pursuing all reasonable alternative investigative steps, as required by the departments regulations that investigators proposed obtaining telephone toll records (logs of calls made and received) for about 20 phone lines that the leaker might have used in conversations with A.P. journalists...The decision was made at the highest levels of the Justice Department, under longstanding regulations that are well within the boundaries of the Constitution. Having participated in similar decisions, we know that they are made after careful deliberation, because the government does not lightly seek information about a reporters work. Along with the obligation to investigate and prosecute government employees who violate their duty to protect operational secrets, Justice Department officials recognize the need to minimize any intrusion into the operations of the free press.
<...>
William P. Barr was the United States attorney general from 1991 to 1993. Jamie S. Gorelick was deputy attorney general from 1994 to 1997. Kenneth L. Wainstein was assistant attorney general for national security from 2006 to 2008.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/opinion/stop-the-leaks.html
By WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMIE S. GORELICK and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
<...>
As former Justice Department officials who served in the three administrations preceding President Obamas, we are worried that the criticism of the decision to subpoena telephone toll records of A.P. journalists in an important leak investigation sends the wrong message to the government officials who are responsible for our national security.
While neither we nor the critics know the circumstances behind the prosecutors decision to issue this subpoena, we do know from the governments public disclosures that the prosecutors were right to investigate this leak vigorously. The leak which resulted in a May 2012 article by The A.P. about the disruption of a Yemen-based terrorist plot to bomb an airliner significantly damaged our national security.
<...>
At the time the article was published, there were strong bipartisan calls for the Justice Department to find the leaker. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. gave that assignment to Ronald C. Machen Jr., the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, who is known for his meticulous and dedicated work. Importantly, his assignment was to identify and prosecute the government official who leaked the sensitive information; it was not to conduct an inquiry into the news organization that published it.
His office, which has an experienced national security team, undertook a methodical and measured investigation. Did prosecutors immediately seek the reporters toll records? No. Did they subpoena the reporters to testify or compel them to turn over their notes? No. Rather, according to the Justice Departments May 14 letter to The A.P., they first interviewed 550 people, presumably those who knew or might have known about the agent, and scoured the documentary record. But after eight months of intensive effort, it appears that they still could not identify the leaker...after pursuing all reasonable alternative investigative steps, as required by the departments regulations that investigators proposed obtaining telephone toll records (logs of calls made and received) for about 20 phone lines that the leaker might have used in conversations with A.P. journalists...The decision was made at the highest levels of the Justice Department, under longstanding regulations that are well within the boundaries of the Constitution. Having participated in similar decisions, we know that they are made after careful deliberation, because the government does not lightly seek information about a reporters work. Along with the obligation to investigate and prosecute government employees who violate their duty to protect operational secrets, Justice Department officials recognize the need to minimize any intrusion into the operations of the free press.
<...>
William P. Barr was the United States attorney general from 1991 to 1993. Jamie S. Gorelick was deputy attorney general from 1994 to 1997. Kenneth L. Wainstein was assistant attorney general for national security from 2006 to 2008.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/opinion/stop-the-leaks.html
Reporter Says He First Learned of C.I.A. Operative From Rove
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022850304
Leaks could sink Obama Whitehouse (2012)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022843810
The AP's being investigated by a grand jury for who they coordinated with in Congress over the leak.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022848186
AP Leak ended informant's rare opportunity, why DOJ went after AP records
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022869034
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022879122
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Heh. I was wondering if you'd seen that Atlantic piece. Puts everything in perspective.
Number23
May 2013
#31
You Said... "fact-free and hilarious"... REALLY... You Think The Diminution Of The 1st Amendment Is
WillyT
May 2013
#8
You Did That Already... I Got It The First Time... Why Are You Hijacking This Thread ???
WillyT
May 2013
#18
I am frankly shocked that Prosense would link to the "Corpsenews" thread,
woo me with science
May 2013
#35
I don't give a tinkers dam who is in the Whitehouse or whose side Fox is on....
Swamp Lover
May 2013
#24
If you are not interested in supporting civil liberties that protect their side as well as ours...
Swamp Lover
May 2013
#30
All of that may be true. And, for all we know the whole thing could have been a Rove plot
sabrina 1
May 2013
#43
Actually the part about Bob Woodward being a lifer in federal prison sort of appeals to me
tularetom
May 2013
#27