Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. It couldn't
Fri May 24, 2013, 07:13 PM
May 2013

"He's right. It is a pattern. And all the excuse-making we're seeing would simply not occur outside of a transparent motive to defend this administration. This selective crackdown on unsanctioned leaks (and only on the unscanctioned ones) started under Bush, and it's getting worse. This is how government becomes opaque and unaccountable to the citizens."

...possibly be that the media are defending their own and those jumping on the bandwagon refuse to acknowleged the facts.

Stop the Leaks

By WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMIE S. GORELICK and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN

<...>

As former Justice Department officials who served in the three administrations preceding President Obama’s, we are worried that the criticism of the decision to subpoena telephone toll records of A.P. journalists in an important leak investigation sends the wrong message to the government officials who are responsible for our national security.

While neither we nor the critics know the circumstances behind the prosecutors’ decision to issue this subpoena, we do know from the government’s public disclosures that the prosecutors were right to investigate this leak vigorously. The leak — which resulted in a May 2012 article by The A.P. about the disruption of a Yemen-based terrorist plot to bomb an airliner — significantly damaged our national security.

<...>

At the time the article was published, there were strong bipartisan calls for the Justice Department to find the leaker. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. gave that assignment to Ronald C. Machen Jr., the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, who is known for his meticulous and dedicated work. Importantly, his assignment was to identify and prosecute the government official who leaked the sensitive information; it was not to conduct an inquiry into the news organization that published it.

His office, which has an experienced national security team, undertook a methodical and measured investigation. Did prosecutors immediately seek the reporters’ toll records? No. Did they subpoena the reporters to testify or compel them to turn over their notes? No. Rather, according to the Justice Department’s May 14 letter to The A.P., they first interviewed 550 people, presumably those who knew or might have known about the agent, and scoured the documentary record. But after eight months of intensive effort, it appears that they still could not identify the leaker...after pursuing “all reasonable alternative investigative steps,” as required by the department’s regulations — that investigators proposed obtaining telephone toll records (logs of calls made and received) for about 20 phone lines that the leaker might have used in conversations with A.P. journalists...The decision was made at the highest levels of the Justice Department, under longstanding regulations that are well within the boundaries of the Constitution. Having participated in similar decisions, we know that they are made after careful deliberation, because the government does not lightly seek information about a reporter’s work. Along with the obligation to investigate and prosecute government employees who violate their duty to protect operational secrets, Justice Department officials recognize the need to minimize any intrusion into the operations of the free press.

<...>

William P. Barr was the United States attorney general from 1991 to 1993. Jamie S. Gorelick was deputy attorney general from 1994 to 1997. Kenneth L. Wainstein was assistant attorney general for national security from 2006 to 2008.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/opinion/stop-the-leaks.html

Reporter Says He First Learned of C.I.A. Operative From Rove
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022850304

Leaks could sink Obama Whitehouse (2012)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022843810

The AP's being investigated by a grand jury for who they coordinated with in Congress over the leak.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022848186

AP Leak ended informant's rare opportunity, why DOJ went after AP records
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022869034



http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022879122

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Actually, ProSense May 2013 #1
Dear ProSense... It Ain't About Fox News... It's About The First Amendment... WillyT May 2013 #2
No, ProSense May 2013 #3
Gotta Admit... I Admire Your Pluck... WillyT May 2013 #13
Heh. I was wondering if you'd seen that Atlantic piece. Puts everything in perspective. Number23 May 2013 #31
No, this really isn't new. jeff47 May 2013 #11
That usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #6
That ProSense May 2013 #7
You Said... "fact-free and hilarious"... REALLY... You Think The Diminution Of The 1st Amendment Is WillyT May 2013 #8
Well, ProSense May 2013 #10
You Did That Already... I Got It The First Time... Why Are You Hijacking This Thread ??? WillyT May 2013 #18
I just do not see the evil that you see in the highlighted text?? kentuck May 2013 #28
I am frankly shocked that Prosense would link to the "Corpsenews" thread, woo me with science May 2013 #35
Well, that's usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #14
You don't seem to understand. The 1st Amendment should be defended no matter sabrina 1 May 2013 #37
Thank you. nt woo me with science May 2013 #38
In that case the DOJ's behavior is even more reprehensible. Swamp Lover May 2013 #9
I remember ProSense May 2013 #22
I don't give a tinkers dam who is in the Whitehouse or whose side Fox is on.... Swamp Lover May 2013 #24
Funny ProSense May 2013 #25
If you are not interested in supporting civil liberties that protect their side as well as ours... Swamp Lover May 2013 #30
All of that may be true. And, for all we know the whole thing could have been a Rove plot sabrina 1 May 2013 #43
He's right. It is a pattern. And all the excuse-making we're seeing DirkGently May 2013 #4
It couldn't ProSense May 2013 #5
Stop usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #12
You have no idea what you're talking about. n/t ProSense May 2013 #15
If usGovOwesUs3Trillion May 2013 #17
that one has a vested interest in protecting EVERYTHING Obama does Skittles May 2013 #20
Actually, ProSense May 2013 #21
we all know it is more than that Skittles May 2013 #23
If you ProSense May 2013 #26
Excellent post. woo me with science May 2013 #34
Eugene Robinson reminds me of William Raspberry Skittles May 2013 #16
Me Too... WillyT May 2013 #19
Actually the part about Bob Woodward being a lifer in federal prison sort of appeals to me tularetom May 2013 #27
Except. Eugene, it was not an unwarranted investigation. nt kelliekat44 May 2013 #29
I do wonder what these same people's opinion dsc May 2013 #32
How are we supposed to find out who the treestar May 2013 #33
Huge K&R. Thank goodness for principled Democrats. woo me with science May 2013 #36
No. George Gently May 2013 #39
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin May 2013 #40
Good morning and thank you. George Gently May 2013 #41
Your Welcome and we are happy to have you. hrmjustin May 2013 #42
kick woo me with science May 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case You Missed This.....»Reply #5