Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bridge collapse could cost Washington state millions, jobs [View all]
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/bridge-collapse-could-cost-washington-state-millions-jobs-6C10066338
A person looks from the south bank of the Skagit River across to the collapsed portion of the Interstate 5 bridge Friday, May 24, 2013, in Mount Vernon, Wash.
The collapse of a bridge on a major West Coast highway could cost the state of Washington at least $47 million in lost economic output, as well lost jobs and tax revenues similar to the impact of a flood five years ago that also shut down another section of the road, officials said Friday.
Brian Bonlender, Director of the State Department of Commerce said it would be difficult to pinpoint the exact economic impact because it depends on how long the road is out of service, how much traffic was disrupted and delayed by detour routes.
But, based on a flood in 2007 that washed out a section of Interstate 5 in Chehalis and closed Interstate-5 in both directions for four days, he was able to estimate economic losses from Thursday's Skagit River Bridge collapse.
"Were still calculating, but certainly expect the impact of the Skagit River Bridge disruption to be similar," Bonlender said in comments e-mailed to NBC News.
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No easy detours. Eastward detours are through elevated areas and on smaller roads. nt
bluestate10
May 2013
#25
All the more reason what the pukes did to Obama's plan is all the more egregious
madokie
May 2013
#11
It meant that if a new bridge was built, it would have been built differently
Travis_0004
May 2013
#20
We had several incidences where too tall trucks brought down overhead pedestrian walkways.
dkf
May 2013
#16
A modern bridge doesn't get taken out by a fucking truck. The bridge was way out of date. nt
bluestate10
May 2013
#26
I remember the nightmare for commuters when part of the Bay Bridge fell during the
lunatica
May 2013
#12
In a rural county, the traffic which normally zips thru here, unnoticed, is a concern...
countryjake
May 2013
#19
My family is in Bellingham, & time would sure be of the essence to me
freeplessinseattle
May 2013
#28