Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Condemnation isn't enough. Muslims must take ownership of the problem in their midst," [View all]whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)82. Not sure how your response relates to my post
That said, speaking of defending the indefensible, if terror is fear born of death and destruction, we're the biggest terrorists around.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Condemnation isn't enough. Muslims must take ownership of the problem in their midst," [View all]
snagglepuss
May 2013
OP
so we need to get out of muslim lands yet we are expected to welcome them into ours?
msongs
May 2013
#1
for at least the couple of centuries, we've got them beat in the killing civilians department
yurbud
May 2013
#8
The violence to which you are referring is not being done in the name of Christianity.
badtoworse
May 2013
#34
Boy I didn't know Atheists were exempt from the draft seeing as how these are all Christian wars.
dkf
May 2013
#69
And even if we accept that equation fully it absolves neither faith of their responsibilities.
Bluenorthwest
May 2013
#4
when Muslims do speak out, do you expect Fox News to cover it or the MSM that is invested in war?
yurbud
May 2013
#9
IOW, there really is a difference in the level of violence between the two religions.
badtoworse
May 2013
#13
My frame of reference is the amount of actual violence done in the name of the religion
badtoworse
May 2013
#24
And is always described as such, even when it's not there. Funny, that. (nt)
Posteritatis
May 2013
#21
instead of just watching Fox News you could google "muslim cleric condemn terrorism"
yurbud
May 2013
#59
I tend to watch NBC for news and haven't seen much there in the way of Muslim condemnation of terror
badtoworse
May 2013
#92
these are mostly thugs who would have done horrible things regardless of their religion
JI7
May 2013
#5
Not that there hasn't always been some nativist violence against the muslim immigrants
MNBrewer
May 2013
#17
How about Westerners "take ownership" of the atrocities committed against Muslims?
CrawlingChaos
May 2013
#23
Why not address the fact that more Muslims are being slaughtered by other Muslims
snagglepuss
May 2013
#48
LOL Kufir is telling. How so? I have no issue acknowledging U.S. war crimes whereas
snagglepuss
May 2013
#57
If you have an invisible friend that tells you to kill people, it's a problem.
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#30
The governments and other institutions of the Western world-especially the United States-
YoungDemCA
May 2013
#55
Whataboutery is the ultimate inanity. Let's stay focused on the issue at hand.
snagglepuss
May 2013
#58
Where's the evidence that terror is born of death and destruction? The vicious violence
snagglepuss
May 2013
#85
Well your post speaks volumes. You haven't even looked at the article. The piece is written
snagglepuss
May 2013
#74
You know nothing of the Guardian which is vilified for being Islamic apologists.
snagglepuss
May 2013
#78