Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: there were 38 fatal dog attacks in 2012 in the US [View all]apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)35. How many were mauled? How many people were attacked and permanently disfigured?
Is death the only benchmark worth considering? And which breed was responsible for most of the deaths?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am aware that horses are not dogs. Sorry this is so apparently confusing for you.
magical thyme
May 2013
#39
I did not call you clueless. I will say there are none so blind as those who will not see...
magical thyme
May 2013
#42
same argument people use to condone guns/assault weapons. They don't kill nearly as many as XYZ
KittyWampus
May 2013
#5
The Bull Shit, maybe. Because that's all that emerges from a pit bull owner's fingertips. nt
Pragdem
May 2013
#45
Why count only fatalities? 4.5 million reported bites on humans, 885,000 requiring medical attention
KurtNYC
May 2013
#13
are those bites in the UK, US or worldwide? Are they for a specific year or set of years?
magical thyme
May 2013
#18
How many were mauled? How many people were attacked and permanently disfigured?
apples and oranges
May 2013
#35
in the instances cited, various neighbors said the dogs had been seen loose
magical thyme
May 2013
#47