General Discussion

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)

36. Oh, that fat fuck Erick "Erick" Erickson? Figures

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Thu May 30, 2013, 10:58 AM

May 2013

I see a Brietbart in his future

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox contributor: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science [View all] kpete May 2013 OP

I've come to terms with the fact that "Conservatives" Drale May 2013 #1

I would love to use the term AsahinaKimi May 2013 #46

If one role is dominant, then there is no 'complimentary' role. Sheldon Cooper May 2013 #2

I noticed that, too. kentauros May 2013 #8

This is part of evolutionary biology. Ikonoklast May 2013 #40

You're right. kentauros May 2013 #43

Ha! I would love to see their new party slogan for 2016! Ikonoklast May 2013 #48

Ha! kentauros May 2013 #49

I realize the article said "complimentary", but I think it meant "complementary." Jim__ May 2013 #21

Yes, that is what he meant siligut May 2013 #39

I think he meant submissive Sophiegirl May 2013 #28

So the party that denies evolution edhopper May 2013 #3

And in lion packs... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #64

Ahem... demwing May 2013 #4

Yup, also add lions, horses, elephants, meerkats, and Bonobos to the matriachal society list. nt riderinthestorm May 2013 #62

seems like female lions keep a male around demwing May 2013 #63

Oh, I see. It's 'natural' for women to be inferior. sinkingfeeling May 2013 #5

How very "lion-like" of them. woodsprite May 2013 #6

You were doing great until that last line. FSogol May 2013 #37

so whomever earns the most gets to dominate the other? liberal_at_heart May 2013 #7

He proved they're still living in the 1950s simply by the use of the term kentauros May 2013 #9

Did he say it like W too? Just Saying May 2013 #11

I have no idea, kentauros May 2013 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Just Saying May 2013 #34

Truth, Justice and ProSense May 2013 #10

Ladies I have a Question- ruffburr May 2013 #13

I have noticed that monkeys sometimes play with their own, shit and fling it mindlessly. 11 Bravo May 2013 #14

I can't wait to see what the Jon Stewart show and Colbert Report do with this one. liberal_at_heart May 2013 #17

But the real question to ask here is: kentauros May 2013 #44

This penis envy is making me so neurotic..... JitterbugPerfume May 2013 #15

And they wonder why women don't vote for Republicans n/t Yavin4 May 2013 #16

“Having mom as primary bread winner is bad for kids and bad for marriage.” pokerfan May 2013 #18

How dare they say we are the anti science party!!!! Initech May 2013 #19

don't forget women's bodies can reject rape sperm and our uteruses are littered with dozens of liberal_at_heart May 2013 #23

It takes some serious cojones to be that moronic. Initech May 2013 #38

When a significant number of men "lost" the ability to provide the single breadwinner income SoCalDem May 2013 #20

"once women were in the workforce and started making enough to support a family, maybe they liberal_at_heart May 2013 #25

Lucky for us all, "they" can only whine about it SoCalDem May 2013 #29

Why don't they just come out and say it? Arkana May 2013 #22

Mayberry had an understanding justice system and a community that cared about each other. antigone382 May 2013 #57

That is totally ridiculous. In_The_Wind May 2013 #24

The survey shows that 63% of the mothers that are primary earners are single mothers. Jim__ May 2013 #26

They believe single mothers deserve to suffer and be punished for being single mothers. liberal_at_heart May 2013 #27

yep.. they just want to shame them and make them beg and apologize for being SoCalDem May 2013 #30

Don't forget widowed moms meow2u3 May 2013 #50

Fox SamKnause May 2013 #31

Our Agnes wonders how the man gets laid and who hired him. PDJane May 2013 #32

I love that! stopwastingmymoney May 2013 #65

My wife loves when I make the decisions and fitman May 2013 #33

More proof of their sexism Just Saying May 2013 #35

Oh, that fat fuck Erick "Erick" Erickson? Figures LondonReign2 May 2013 #36

The female Praying Mantis eats the male after mating. AndyA May 2013 #41

Do these guys even KNOW any women??? Spitfire of ATJ May 2013 #42

I highly doubt it. Initech May 2013 #53

This! nt chowder66 May 2013 #56

has he ever watched animals? KT2000 May 2013 #45

He has an ugly history of saying sexist crap about women. Jennicut May 2013 #47

From what tar pit did this decrepit dinosaur crawl Skidmore May 2013 #51

Erik Erikson - why would anyone take anything he said seriously? rurallib May 2013 #52

WTF ????!!!! nt clarice May 2013 #54

Tell that to a male preying mantis. Rex May 2013 #55

Some people can't let the 1950s die davidn3600 May 2013 #58

Then there are the ones who feel it was the 80's under Reagan... Spitfire of ATJ May 2013 #59

great takedown of Erick Erickson's ignorance by biologist PZ Myers: alp227 May 2013 #60

I'm sure the women of DU now realize the error of their ways NewJeffCT May 2013 #61

Republicans would use that graph for a completely different purpose. freshwest May 2013 #66