Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Discussion: Should Rape be a Capital Crime? [View all]IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)60. MORE: Should a victim kill a rapist during an attack? Or immediately thereafter?
An example of the challenges presented in this attitude involve Rape in the Military.
The female victims are armed, trained to kill, frequently know their attackers - and yet the rapists are still alive/walking/not in prison.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/politics/joint-chiefs-testimony-on-sexual-assault-dismays-senators.html
(snip)
The hearing followed several weeks of reports of sexual assault in the armed forces and a Pentagon survey that estimated that 26,000 people in the armed forces were sexually assaulted last year, up from 19,000 in 2010. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, who on Tuesday called sexual assault in the military beyond the pale, said the Senate would move to address the problem in the coming defense bill. Something has to be done about it, he said.
(snip)
Ms. Gillibrand also chided the leaders for sometimes understating the gravity of some of the crimes before them, noting that one commander had told a victim that he believed her assailant had not acted like a gentleman but had not committed a crime. Not every commander can distinguish between a slap on the ass and a rape, Ms. Gillibrand said.
Several advocates for victims of sexual assault also testified, in some cases offering chilling testimony about women and men who had been sexually abused and then lost their careers by seeking justice. The military does not create rapists, said Anu Bhagwati, who served as a Marine captain and is executive director of the Service Womens Action Network. But, she said, it does condone sexual violence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No. Historically, it was the 'legal' basis for lynching. Read Coker v. Georgia and Kennedy v.
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#1
It is as most violent crimes rape is an irrational act so deterrents don't mean a lot
MindPilot
Jun 2013
#42
No, what would deter the rapist from murdering his victim so she could never tell..
angstlessk
Jun 2013
#5
What kind of person starts an OP about rape and adds a popcorn smiley at the bottom of it?
Jamastiene
Jun 2013
#34
I think it should be eligible for a life sentence, in some cases, particularly if the victim
nomorenomore08
Jun 2013
#51
Yes. If you're saying punishable with the death penalty, I think some forms of rape should be
Number23
Jun 2013
#58
MORE: Should a victim kill a rapist during an attack? Or immediately thereafter?
IdaBriggs
Jun 2013
#60