General Discussion

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

41. well, the NY Mets are the NY Mets, but the 1964 mets and the 1969 mets were different

Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:03 PM

Jun 2013

and the 1973 mets and the 2012 and 2013 mets are different

even though the name is the same, should there be as I predict a landslide in 2016, everything will be different and HIllary
already saying that the 3 advisors that did so mediocre(or bad) won't be with her, is already saying things will be different.

Bill followed the ultra conservative Reagan and 41
Hillary will follow the liberal Obama (though of course some here think he is not liberal enough)

but it makes the gameplan much different.

Especially with the SCOTUS- the next two should be democratic replacements, but then the next 4 should be switches.
that is all the difference in the world.

(and can anyone say the appointees by Clinton and Obama are 1000 times better than Roberts and Alito.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TIME MAGAZINE-has JEB BUSH's time come? why another Bush may run in 2016 [View all] graham4anything Jun 2013 OP

Hillary libodem Jun 2013 #1

Really? zappaman Jun 2013 #8

They are cutting off their noses libodem Jun 2013 #13

yeah, not voting will show 'em! zappaman Jun 2013 #15

And I picked Hillary for my example of a crush machine libodem Jun 2013 #21

Easy to say that they're not voting now customerserviceguy Jun 2013 #32

Alert? No way! Habibi Jun 2013 #20

So we're doing dynasties now, sweet. NightWatcher Jun 2013 #2

I know. If this happens, I suspect many voters will go third party if there is a sane Nay Jun 2013 #7

We only had one Clinton so far. How is that a dynasty? Auntie Bush Jun 2013 #31

I don't think we ever need two of any family to run for President; it's just a quirk of mine, I Nay Jun 2013 #37

Odd how that seems to just naturally start happening as things unravel. /nt Marr Jun 2013 #10

Gross. The last thing we need is the BFEE back in charge. Initech Jun 2013 #3

+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 BainsBane Jun 2013 #5

jeb bush always looks like an unmade bed...this is not an attack on his physical traits...it is... Tikki Jun 2013 #4

I thought it was an attack on unmade beds Tom Ripley Jun 2013 #27

3rd Way Dem against a Republican. Lousy choice. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #6

I agree it's not the best choice. zappaman Jun 2013 #9

i will vote for the most progressive, anti-war, candidate on the ballot. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #11

Elections SamKnause Jun 2013 #12

3rd Parties WovenGems Jun 2013 #30

bwaaa haaa ha! struggle4progress Jun 2013 #14

dear gods, please spare us another bush v clinton presidential campaign....and winner nt msongs Jun 2013 #16

Indeed. If those are our choices, we can throw the towel in already. Put a fork in us, we're done. Nay Jun 2013 #38

I think it would make for an exciting, emotional, important election. Auntie Bush Jun 2013 #39

Damn Lannisters Yavin4 Jun 2013 #17

I hate to break this to you but NO your prediction has not come true. cali Jun 2013 #18

One thing that can't be denied is- Hillary will kick Jeb's rear end in the general. graham4anything Jun 2013 #22

no more bushes, no more clintons. especially bushes. bushes in power since fucking forever, HiPointDem Jun 2013 #19

95% OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY support Bill Clinton, though it is insulting to say Hillary is a clone graham4anything Jun 2013 #23

no they don't. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #24

His Mother's quote about "No More Bushes" will be aired constantly. Motown_Johnny Jun 2013 #25

NO MORE BUSHES! Dawson Leery Jun 2013 #26

Oh HELL No. MichiganVote Jun 2013 #28

Oh no, no more Bushes, please! duuser5822 Jun 2013 #29

No worries here about that customerserviceguy Jun 2013 #34

"The abuse will continue until morale improves..." cliffordu Jun 2013 #33

Text book definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results Initech Jun 2013 #35

well, the NY Mets are the NY Mets, but the 1964 mets and the 1969 mets were different graham4anything Jun 2013 #41

I will vote for any Democrat who is nominated even though octoberlib Jun 2013 #36

Bwhahaha,.... Segami Jun 2013 #40

Now that's a DUsy libodem Jun 2013 #42

Yup!....can't you tell..the mouth gives it all away. Segami Jun 2013 #43

I've been saying this for years. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #44