General Discussion

morningfog

(18,115 posts)

17. Such a statement is far too broad. There are issues

Reply to Yavin4 (Original post)

Tue Jun 25, 2013, 07:38 PM

Jun 2013

though, were there is no difference of such small difference as to be none.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

To all those upset at the SCOTUS today.... [View all] Yavin4 Jun 2013 OP

+1. VOTE straight democratic every single election there is from President to freeholder to anything graham4anything Jun 2013 #1

+1!!!!! gateley Jun 2013 #2

There is a difference ... Scuba Jun 2013 #3

Oh the difference between Voting Rights for all Americans and Cha Jun 2013 #15

Abortion rights and same sex marriage? Food stamps? EPA, DOE, Iran? Oh, well. freshwest Jun 2013 #19

Thanks fresh.. exactly. Cha Jun 2013 #20

Illuminating to see to whom the rights of me and those I care about don't mean a hill of beans. freshwest Jun 2013 #23

But but but Social Security.. Cha Jun 2013 #25

When there's trouble, you gotta know who has your back, instead of this guy: freshwest Jun 2013 #31

Yes, you do.. and I know Cha Jun 2013 #35

And the Donkey they rode in on, LOL! freshwest Jun 2013 #40

And, now we have Senator Markey to help with that load we're Cha Jun 2013 #43

+1 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #27

Damned straight. You earned it! freshwest Jun 2013 #33

A twice-elected Democratic President endorsed cutting Social Security .... Scuba Jun 2013 #21

Go President Obama!! Yay, he's our President!!! Cha Jun 2013 #22

I don't consider standing up for Social Security "whining". If you do I think that's just sad. Scuba Jun 2013 #24

We're all standing up for Social Security.. and we're not throwing away Cha Jun 2013 #26

No, we're not ALL standing up for Social Security ... Scuba Jun 2013 #34

I'm sorry, I don't have time for this.. everyone I know stands up for it.. and Cha Jun 2013 #39

If President Obama had gotten support leading into the 2010 midterms, we wouldn't be bluestate10 Jun 2013 #36

Right, cause no one could expect the President to stand up for SS while the R's control the House. Scuba Jun 2013 #37

A fine discussion along those lines here BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #4

Thanks Godz the Democrats didn't confirm any of these assholes n/t leftstreet Jun 2013 #5

Right, and then the Republicans don't confirm any of our "assholes". KittyWampus Jun 2013 #7

You're saying Democrats nominate assholes to the SC? leftstreet Jun 2013 #9

+1 HiPointDem Jun 2013 #10

Unless the nominee is truly awful, the Senate is going to pass the POTUS' nominee Yavin4 Jun 2013 #12

I tweeted something similar today. JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #6

On that same subject, from Egbertowillie's thread: freshwest Jun 2013 #45

Rec. President Obama's appointees did NOT help this to happen. -nt CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #8

but...but...Obama will just appoint people like Roberts, say the firebaggers Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #11

Either "republicon operatives" or entrenched Cha Jun 2013 #16

^^ This! ^^ BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #28

I am convinced that two of the most prominent anti-Obama posters on DU are republican bluestate10 Jun 2013 #38

^^^This^^^ Thanks. bluestate. freshwest Jun 2013 #41

Yes, indeed. I agree. lumpy Jun 2013 #44

I was born to Democrats about half a century ago and on days like this here is what I say: Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #13

there is mostly certainly a difference between republicons and Cha Jun 2013 #14

Such a statement is far too broad. There are issues morningfog Jun 2013 #17

Kick! LeftInTX Jun 2013 #18

100% right ! K and R ! RBInMaine Jun 2013 #29

K&R! eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2013 #30

And yet, "Obama=Bush" name-calling persists. Is that true when it comes to SCOTUS nominees? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #32

But...but..but davidpdx Jun 2013 #42

Yes. A day to remember. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #46

The smart ones will stay away rufus dog Jun 2013 #47

Kick politicasista Jun 2013 #48