Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RC

(25,592 posts)

5. Just because they have a (D) by their names does not mean they are Democrats.

Reply to quinnox (Original post)

Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:16 PM

Feb 2012

We do need a second party.
A Liberal and Progressive Democratic Party. A real Democratic Party, representative of the people. Not the party of DINO's we have now.
With the DLC takeover of the Democratic party complete, moving to the Right far enough to Replace the Sane part of the Republican party (hence the Clown Car of Presidential candidates that is left of the Republican Party).
The DLC was dissolved last year because its job was done.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=13683

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So looks like the Dems caved to the GOP, cutting long term unemployment benefits [View all] quinnox Feb 2012 OP

link please uponit7771 Feb 2012 #1

link - quinnox Feb 2012 #4

How ProSense Feb 2012 #6

All deals are "caving." Robb Feb 2012 #7

It's ProSense Feb 2012 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Feb 2012 #2

Link? n/t FSogol Feb 2012 #3

Just because they have a (D) by their names does not mean they are Democrats. RC Feb 2012 #5

I need to start doing that, quoting myself with a link. Robb Feb 2012 #8

Harry, Nancy, Barack, and I assume Kent should be smacked for not indexing benefits to the UI rate TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #9

Extended ProSense Feb 2012 #11

In order to actually be indexed to the UI rate, it would also need to extend based on the rate TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #21

There's a new one every day, woo me with science Feb 2012 #10

How they propose to pay for it will just pit another group of people against each other. sad sally Feb 2012 #13

Kick woo me with science Feb 2012 #14

Is 73 weeks go past the next Presidential Inaguration? Rosco T. Feb 2012 #15

It's still well over a year... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #16

Kick. nt woo me with science Feb 2012 #17

Editorial: GOP caves on payroll tax cut ProSense Feb 2012 #18

When President Obama extended the Bush Tax Cuts for TWO additional years, bvar22 Feb 2012 #19

I'm lucky.....I have had a job the entire time we've had economic disaster hit the USA Sheepshank Feb 2012 #20