General Discussion

struggle4progress

(127,213 posts)

35. Holy moly! Them dirty rotten bastiges has followed them's own publitched regulashuns

Tue Jul 2, 2013, 03:10 PM

Jul 2013

22 CFR Subpart E — Denial, Revocation, and Restriction of Passports

§ 51.60 Denial and restriction of passports.

... (b) The Department may refuse to issue a passport in any case in which the Department determines or is informed by competent authority that:

(1) The applicant is the subject of an outstanding Federal warrant of arrest for a felony ... <or>

(5) The applicant is the subject of a request for extradition or provisional request for extradition which has been presented to the government of a foreign country ...

§ 51.62 Revocation or limitation of passports.

(a) The Department may revoke or limit a passport when

(1) The bearer of the passport may be denied a passport under 22 CFR 51.60 ...

§ 51.65 Notification of denial or revocation of passport.

(a) The Department will notify in writing any person .. whose passport has been revoked ...

§ 51.66 Surrender of passport.

The bearer of a passport that is revoked must surrender it .. upon demand ...

http://cfr.regstoday.com/22cfr51.aspx#22_CFR_51pSUBPART_E

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

112 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the hell is Snowden talking about when he says the U.S. "unilaterally revoked my passport"? [View all] Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 OP

"16-year-old kid in a 30-year-old man's body..." gcomeau Jul 2013 #1

+1 graham4anything Jul 2013 #4

++ tee hee. Whisp Jul 2013 #8

And they are directing their forces here to "stoke up outrage & rebellion". Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #12

LOL! Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #18

a dim 16-year-old at that. MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #36

this^^^^ arely staircase Jul 2013 #57

^^^^ ellisonz Jul 2013 #64

Well, since the US "unilaterally" issued it in the first place, I'm not sure what he's talking about Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #2

If they had wanted to, I wonder how they would have done it bilaterally? Squinch Jul 2013 #28

!!! Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #32

Apparently he didn't know this n/t malaise Jul 2013 #3

Well, he doesn't seem to think the mission of a spy agency should be spying. aquart Jul 2013 #37

Not on Americans in violation of the U.S. Constitution...no. Roland99 Jul 2013 #55

Agreed. But he hasn't stopped there, has he? aquart Jul 2013 #67

He's talking out his ass--it seems to be a habit with him. MADem Jul 2013 #5

Snowden should be a case study of what happens when you go truthy on the intertubes... snooper2 Jul 2013 #6

Winner winner chicken dinner! NightWatcher Jul 2013 #13

"Winner winner chicken dinner!" x 2 Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #21

He talks like Sarah. Whisp Jul 2013 #7

I think that the GeeGee Effect! flamingdem Jul 2013 #23

I'm not sure that statement was even written by him. Seems suspicious. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #27

Who cares? It's not about Snowden. Scuba Jul 2013 #9

His travel status is "not about him"? nt stevenleser Jul 2013 #10

!!! Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #14

Who cares what Snowden's travel status is? Or his naivety regarding passports? Scuba Jul 2013 #15

I care about the status of dishonest traitors. nt stevenleser Jul 2013 #19

What was your position on Daniel Ellsberg? former9thward Jul 2013 #30

Ellsberg did not take 7-8 laptops full of classified information to the Chinese and Russians. stevenleser Jul 2013 #47

What about al-Qaeda ? Seems if he is thorough he'd give it to them too. AlinPA Jul 2013 #53

I wouldn't put it past him. When he is back in the US and on the stand, it will be interesting stevenleser Jul 2013 #62

There is no evidence that Snowden gave anything to the Chinese or Russians. former9thward Jul 2013 #63

LOL, that's what you are going with? Really? stevenleser Jul 2013 #68

wait, wasn't it just 7-8 laptops? frylock Jul 2013 #74

Because being a traitor with 4 laptops vs 7 laptops of classified info is such a big difference? stevenleser Jul 2013 #93

why not make it 400 laptops? frylock Jul 2013 #96

Turning over 4, 7, or 400 laptops full of classified info to the Russians and Chinese makes no diff stevenleser Jul 2013 #98

Now its up to 400 former9thward Jul 2013 #100

I'm not the one who said 400. You do realize that right? It was Frylock up thread. stevenleser Jul 2013 #101

You keyboard patriots need to get together. former9thward Jul 2013 #103

None of what you wrote is mutually exclusive. They're all part of the truth stevenleser Jul 2013 #104

I didn't know data was measured in laptops worth Progressive dog Jul 2013 #102

I don't know what went on there. former9thward Jul 2013 #81

You should have simply stopped with the first three words in your subject. You would have been right stevenleser Jul 2013 #97

you know that they didn't have laptops back then? frylock Jul 2013 #73

I'm trying to figure a way your point could be less relevant. Ellsberg did not take unrelated stevenleser Jul 2013 #92

snowden has ellsberg's full support.. frylock Jul 2013 #95

You're still using a logical fallacy by using his opinion as fact. "Appeal to Authority" stevenleser Jul 2013 #99

Exactly. Raine1967 Jul 2013 #82

now it's 7-8 laptops? grasswire Jul 2013 #91

Because being a traitor with 4 laptops vs 7 laptops of classified info is such a big difference? stevenleser Jul 2013 #94

Do you think ProSense Jul 2013 #20

Yeah who cared about the travel status of Benedict Arnold either? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #56

Probably the people on this thread. bornskeptic Jul 2013 #87

Like all good Pualbots Andy823 Jul 2013 #11

Who cares what his agenda is? naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #16

I love responses like this BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #65

I would prefer Andy823 Jul 2013 #83

+1. So far, none of the 20 countries he's applied to, have jumped at his offer. I don't think it's Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #17

I agree with you Andy823 Jul 2013 #85

I agree Andy, he is a patsy, fell for their line and now he will pay the price of doing their cause. Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #84

From what I have seen Andy823 Jul 2013 #88

When the US requests extradition of a citizen it revokes their passport. He should've DevonRex Jul 2013 #22

go get him! Enrique Jul 2013 #24

Enrique, you're really starting to lose it Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #25

yes it's crazy to imagine that people are obsessing over any imagined fault of Snowden Enrique Jul 2013 #31

There's no shortage of threads for you guys who aren't "avid Obama defenders". Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #34

how about this one? Skittles Jul 2013 #40

Got any Snowden threads? great white snark Jul 2013 #48

I wish some DUers would stop worrying about Obama Skittles Jul 2013 #52

I wish some DUers wouldn't blame Obama for all America's problems. great white snark Jul 2013 #58

tired of this Skittles Jul 2013 #59

And I'm tire of this shit Iliyah Jul 2013 #75

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles Jul 2013 #76

LOL Iliyah Jul 2013 #78

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles Jul 2013 #79

did you happen to live through the coup attempt against Clinton? grasswire Jul 2013 #111

Oh, you mean the 26 senators who are now in some serious CYA mode? Deflect! Deflect! Deflect! Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #50

I know who is in CYA mode Skittles Jul 2013 #60

You wish. The body charged with making the law, overseeing the law, is now questioning the law? Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #72

exhibit #5367 Skittles Jul 2013 #77

The ability to tell the difference between the truth and a lie nineteen50 Jul 2013 #42

Hyperbole much? BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #26

"Unilaterally" sounds ominous. CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #29

Playin' to his fans.. It's been pointed out that.. Who else was the USA suppose to ask Cha Jul 2013 #33

Holy moly! Them dirty rotten bastiges has followed them's own publitched regulashuns struggle4progress Jul 2013 #35

At this point he'll take flamingdem Jul 2013 #38

The Passport is just paper and a picture, he is still a Citizen and entitled to his rights. 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #39

I believe those rights include the right to a trial by his peers. brooklynite Jul 2013 #45

Or he is one individual struggling against the most powerful nineteen50 Jul 2013 #41

My opinion only, but Iliyah Jul 2013 #43

is this another one of those "snowden is making this about snowden" threads? frylock Jul 2013 #44

Yes and it is getting beyond pathetic. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #70

if snowden is a narcissist, what do you call someone who's obsessed with a narcissist? frylock Jul 2013 #71

He still has the right to seek asylum. Mr.Bill Jul 2013 #46

Who cares? truebluegreen Jul 2013 #49

The constant Snowden character assassination here is extremely suspicious FreeBC Jul 2013 #51

The old, tired 'character assassination' meme CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #66

Snowden's character is not being assassinated. Moosepoop Jul 2013 #69

ROFL alcibiades_mystery Jul 2013 #80

FreeBC, Snowden has made a mess out of his character, this is his own mess and he will have to be Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #89

Who cares? FreeBC Jul 2013 #108

you are right, who cares about Snowden, he disregards our laws so who cares about what he says. Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #109

great! FreeBC Jul 2013 #110

What crime can you charge them with? Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #112

My impression.... BAPhill Jul 2013 #54

He reminds me of my ex boss who said of his troops appleannie1 Jul 2013 #61

Allow me to translate for you. randome Jul 2013 #86

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #90

Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #105

What I'd like to know is who was the one of 6 who said "leave" to this rambling personal attack uppityperson Jul 2013 #106

Your whole damn post is a personal attack. HappyMe Jul 2013 #107