General Discussion

Mr. David

(535 posts)

3. Here's my opinion

Reply to graham4anything (Original post)

Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:46 PM

Jul 2013

Clinton will not be the nominee in 2016. And you're *STILL* jumping the gun by foisting us on Hillary who would turn to her late 70s by the time she is inaugurated.

I'd rather have someone who's younger, more progressive (Clinton is still DLC/Third wayer, no matter how you define it) and more in tune with the people who wants the direction to go THAT WAY, instead of continuing the same tired old pattern that has no real future except for the 1%'ers who continue to siphon off us.

Plus, you still have to consider her health issues. I don't think she will be willing to run if she is still in recovery.

Do me a favor, Graham, and LAY OFF the Clinton foisting off until the presidential season gets underway (shortly after '14) so you are not disappointed.

Also, this ain't a monarchy. Get with the program, sir.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Michelle Obama should be Hillary Clinton's VP in 16 &20 in one paragraph-(my opinion) [View all] graham4anything Jul 2013 OP

.... SMC22307 Jul 2013 #1

Eloquently Stated Sherman A1 Jul 2013 #23

your opinion but I do not want her to be president Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #2

Ha! I don't want either one of them to be president tularetom Jul 2013 #29

I think the Presidency should be limited to LuvNewcastle Jul 2013 #30

More imprtant is SHE doesn't want to be President. Booster Jul 2013 #31

Here's my opinion Mr. David Jul 2013 #3

She'd be in her late 60s. RudynJack Jul 2013 #9

If Hillary chose to run and if she was elected in 2016, she would be 69, not Arkansas Granny Jul 2013 #11

What is she recovering from? The fall still? postulater Jul 2013 #12

Warren is the same age as Hillary Clinton, stop buying into the GOP "old" nonesense. allin99 Jul 2013 #39

Do you hear that sound? PennsylvaniaMatt Jul 2013 #4

It is clear Michelle Obama has no desire at all to run for public office dsc Jul 2013 #5

retirement? I predict President Obama will be nominated to US Supreme Court in 2018 by Hillary. graham4anything Jul 2013 #7

no more clintons,bushes in the white house... movonne Jul 2013 #6

I'm pretty sure Michelle has no interest in politics at that level. Whisp Jul 2013 #8

+1 CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #14

+2 Hekate Jul 2013 #25

I`d like a refreshing change next time around.... democrank Jul 2013 #10

Agreed Sherman A1 Jul 2013 #22

So you're saying the Tea Party Republicans would apply RATIONAL principles... brooklynite Jul 2013 #13

Darryl Isaa has had one irrational desire after another the last number of years, hasn't he LOL graham4anything Jul 2013 #17

I'm fine with Hillary qazplm Jul 2013 #15

I could give a crap about a fading Rush Limbaugh mick063 Jul 2013 #16

Really? You're comparing Mrs. Obama to Ike? MrSlayer Jul 2013 #18

"Michelle Obama isn't qualified to be dog catcher" CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #34

Bah! You know better than this. MrSlayer Jul 2013 #35

I don't believe in dynastic ascension either CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #36

Oh I agree 100% on that. MrSlayer Jul 2013 #37

Ike didn't run anything? The ETO counts in my book----big time. Also virgogal Jul 2013 #19

Rush Limbaugh's Face? Motown_Johnny Jul 2013 #20

She's not a politician and doesn't seem to want to be. Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #21

If your doctor is unavailable do you just have her husband take care of it? TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #24

I think you need another paragraph. n/t Smarmie Doofus Jul 2013 #26

Perfect. Place holders until your inevitable campaign to elevate Chelsea Clinton WestStar Jul 2013 #27

An idea so crazy... TeeYiYi Jul 2013 #28

picture response below: galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #32

sadly, I think that's as good an explanation as any. cali Jul 2013 #33

What's your obsession with Hillary? Apophis Jul 2013 #38