General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT: Barring of Bolivian Plane Infuriates Latin America as Snowden Case Widens [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)just accidentally that day noticed a plane (are all these officials Air Traffic Controllers btw?) in the sky that needed to be diverted from landing for fuel to another country and even when they have stated, as France has, eg, that their minister WAS TOLD THAT SNOWDEN WAS ON THE PLANE (see today's news) they still believe some fairy tale about fuel. Even when the story is that the PLANE WAS SUSPECTED OF HAVING SNOWDEN ON BOARD, they don't HEAR THAT PART and stick to one of the initial excuses, NOW DROPPED, that it was about fuel. And they fail to see that IF IT WAS ABOUT FUEL, then they could have caused the plane to crash by refusing to allow it to land! Talk about staggeringly stupid.
Anyhow, the news reports show that those countries all thought Snowden was on the plane, so that is settled. France has admitted this being the reason for the diversion. Now we need to find out WHO Told them that? One report claims it was the US Ambassador to Austria! But who told HIM??
One thing we know, it was NOT about fuel!