For God Sakes (Reply #13) - Democratic Underground

Mon Jul 8, 2013, 08:18 AM

trumad (41,692 posts)

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

18 replies	Author	Time	Post
Embarrassed by breastfeeding in a country of billboards covered in tits? [View all]	SidDithers	Jul 2013	OP
Are you using "tits" in you OP subject line for shock value?	Cooley Hurd	Jul 2013	#1
No, I'm copying the title from the post at scienceblogs...	SidDithers	Jul 2013	#2
the word "tits" is shocking?	zappaman	Jul 2013	#3
It can be sexist. Of course, all has to be taken in context.	Cooley Hurd	Jul 2013	#4
Bullshit... Women have been using the term for centuries. Matter of fact they	lumpy	Jul 2013	#8
No, it's sexist depending on the context.	Cooley Hurd	Jul 2013	#11
Right. And the word ass is, depending on the context, as well.	TransitJohn	Jul 2013	#15
That's what's on the billboards. Tits.	Ron Green	Jul 2013	#5
For God Sakes	trumad	Jul 2013	#13
And well-spoken she is.	randome	Jul 2013	#6
Probably not in my lifetime.....	cliffordu	Jul 2013	#17
Perhaps preoccupation with tits will "drop," so men can better focus on	Eleanors38	Jul 2013	#18
Her point is well taken. This country is tit happy and getting to be a worn out	lumpy	Jul 2013	#7
Agreeing with something Sid posted?	RC	Jul 2013	#9
I know	whatchamacallit	Jul 2013	#10
Agreed. It shouldn't be a big deal	woolldog	Jul 2013	#12
Hilarious. N/T	GreenStormCloud	Jul 2013	#14
That is a good point	treestar	Jul 2013	#16

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.