Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
55. I suppose
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 03:05 PM
Jul 2013

"It's a matter of debate"

...it is. I mean, there are ethical and medical concerns and other issues to be considered. Still, is trying to keep someone alive the same as torturing them to death?

Dianne Feinstein:

"Hunger strikes are a long known form of non-violent protest aimed at bringing attention to a cause, rather than an attempt at suicide," she wrote in a letter. "I believe that the current approach raises very important ethical questions and complicates the difficult situation regarding the continued indefinite detention at Guantanamo. I urge you to re-evaluate the force-feeding policies at Guantanamo Bay and put in place the most humane policies possible."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/feinstein-stop-force-feeding-guantanamo-bay-detainees

Now, let's say the administration stops this practice. What happens if a prisoner dies?

War crimes tribunal orders force-feeding of Serbian warlord

The UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague last night ordered the force-feeding of a Serbian warlord and senior politician who has been on hunger strike in custody for almost a month.

The decision, the first such order since the court was set up more than a decade ago to deal with war crimes in the former Yugoslavia, came after a medical examination of Vojislav Seselj concluded that he might be a fortnight away from dying.

<...>

The tribunal last night told Dutch authorities to force-feed Mr Seselj if there was a risk of him dying. "There is a prevailing interest in continuing with the trial of the accused in order to serve the ends of justice," it said in a statement. "The trial ... should not be undermined by the accused's manipulative behaviour."

<...>

While stating that any force-feeding deemed necessary for lifesaving purposes should not contradict "compelling internationally accepted standards of medical ethics or binding rules of international law", the judges at the tribunal also noted that the body of law laid down by the European court of human rights did not view force-feeding as "torture, inhuman or degrading treatment if there is a medical necessity to do so ... and if the manner in which the detainee is force-fed is not inhuman or degrading".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/dec/07/balkans.warcrimes

The best way out of this situation is to end the practice, release the prisoners and close Gitmo. Can that happen before a tragedy (death by starvation)?

New State Dept. Envoy Begins Work Of Closing Guantánamo

The new State Department special envoy for closing the United States military's detention center located at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba began the effort to shut down the polarizing prison camp, McClatchy reported Thursday.

Clifford Sloan, a former publisher of Slate magazine and a Washington attorney who’s worked in all three branches of government, embarked on a one-day tour of the prison facility, where he had discussions with military and medical personnel.

In a major national security speech in May, President Barack Obama vowed to close Gitmo, which he said has "become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law." Obama has drawn criticism, mostly from the left, for failing to close the detention center during his first term in office, despite his 2008 campaign pledge to do so.

“President Obama has been very clear as he laid out the goal,and the objective is to close Guantánamo," Sloan told McClatchy. “Our marching orders are clear.”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/new-state-dept-envoy-begins-work-of-closing

ACLU Comment on Appointment of Envoy to Close Guantánamo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023036083



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick for ProSense Jul 2013 #1
is Josh aware what they did to Bradley Manning? Enrique Jul 2013 #2
Manning didn't whistleblow, he document dumped. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #3
you misunderstood my post n/t Enrique Jul 2013 #4
And Jose Padilla? Yipes, has Josh Marshall fallen HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #8
Jose Padilla is a whitleblower? ProSense Jul 2013 #15
Jose Padilla is an American citizen who was tortured while HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #16
Jose Padilla has absolutely nothing to do with a discussion about whistleblowers. Nothing! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #22
The point of this subthread is that AMERICAN CITIZENS are/have been TORTURED in US CUSTODY. yodermon Jul 2013 #57
Padilla has everything to do with what American citizens who are fugitives from justice might HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #61
Bush sanctioning torture and Jose Padilla have absolutely nothing to do with whistleblowers. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #63
unfortunately the current pres questionseverything Jul 2013 #65
Military courts-martial and civilian prosecutions are totally different animals frazzled Jul 2013 #13
And Ellsberg had proof. Snowden has claims. Big difference. randome Jul 2013 #14
Just because he's Ellsberg does not mean he is right. randome Jul 2013 #5
is this coordinated? Enrique Jul 2013 #7
We held a meeting. randome Jul 2013 #9
I got the blue pieces BeyondGeography Jul 2013 #29
oh yes, just like the treebaggers used to do in 2008... dionysus Jul 2013 #67
Clint Eastwood has always been a Republican and a conservative, ran for office as one years ago. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #28
My 'facts' are always subject to revision. randome Jul 2013 #32
You made a claim about them that was no true. It is that simple. You made it up. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #53
There are several in their group that just make shit up all the time. reusrename Jul 2013 #58
Right. I was wrong. But most people assumed they were something other than Conservative/Libertarian. randome Jul 2013 #66
times have in fact, changed. galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #6
Our former VP openly brags of having committed torture and HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #11
Actually, ProSense Jul 2013 #18
not so much arely staircase Jul 2013 #27
Josh Marshall is being deliberately obtuse. Broward Jul 2013 #10
glad you straightened him out bigtree Jul 2013 #36
Glad you straightened me out Broward Jul 2013 #48
t'was my pleasure bigtree Jul 2013 #49
Josh is pretending to be stupid. reusrename Jul 2013 #60
mebbe bigtree Jul 2013 #62
Josh Marsall is smart.. you're pretending otherwise. Cha Jul 2013 #69
Are you pretending to be stupid? reusrename Jul 2013 #70
what? Thomas Drake wasn't persecuted? He would beg to differ cali Jul 2013 #12
Silliness ProSense Jul 2013 #21
"routine law enforcement is not persecution." hootinholler Jul 2013 #42
And it was the current Administration that dropped charges to a misdemeanor. randome Jul 2013 #23
And how many of them were out on bail awaiting trial? Savannahmann Jul 2013 #17
Snowden has proven himself a flight risk arely staircase Jul 2013 #38
And Manning and the rest? Savannahmann Jul 2013 #46
Manning is being tried under a different system so I don't know what the standards for bail are. arely staircase Jul 2013 #47
Josh must hope to get invited to Meet the Press Octafish Jul 2013 #19
what? bigtree Jul 2013 #35
Daniel Ellsberg very clearly explains what he means by it in his own essay, enough Jul 2013 #20
It was pre-FISA! treestar Jul 2013 #24
Oh, yeah. That. randome Jul 2013 #25
Good point, and ProSense Jul 2013 #26
Ah so you do thnk he is a whistleblower entitled to whistleblower protections? dkf Jul 2013 #30
The ProSense Jul 2013 #31
No, but he and his supporters think he is a whistleblower treestar Jul 2013 #59
glad Marshall fleshed this out bigtree Jul 2013 #33
We hadn't yet developed the tendency to throw people into the hole so as to keep them incommunicado Romulus Quirinus Jul 2013 #34
Here's ProSense Jul 2013 #37
Mr. Kim didn't embarass the same people that Mr. Snowden did, nor did Mr. Kim threaten their power. Romulus Quirinus Jul 2013 #39
Are you talking about Snowden releasing U.S. state secrets to other countries? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #40
As Mr. Kim did? nt Romulus Quirinus Jul 2013 #41
What? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #43
Is this what you mean? kentuck Jul 2013 #44
Yes, ProSense Jul 2013 #45
Two Words: AMERICA TORTURES Th1onein Jul 2013 #50
That's a change? ProSense Jul 2013 #51
And you speak under what authority as to that which is in the hearts of others? 'I know you want' Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #52
Your comment makes no sense. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #56
It's a matter of debate Astrad Jul 2013 #54
I suppose ProSense Jul 2013 #55
Maybe Ellsburg knows his own case better than this author does. Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #64
Thank goodness for Josh Marshall.. I was thinking Cha Jul 2013 #68
Lawrence O'Donnell talked about this Ellsberg piece on his show tonight. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #71
Snowden claims are suspect. ProSense Jul 2013 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Marshall: Kinda Curi...»Reply #55