Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Josh Marshall: Kinda Curious What That Means (Ellsberg's claim) [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)55. I suppose
"It's a matter of debate"
...it is. I mean, there are ethical and medical concerns and other issues to be considered. Still, is trying to keep someone alive the same as torturing them to death?
Dianne Feinstein:
"Hunger strikes are a long known form of non-violent protest aimed at bringing attention to a cause, rather than an attempt at suicide," she wrote in a letter. "I believe that the current approach raises very important ethical questions and complicates the difficult situation regarding the continued indefinite detention at Guantanamo. I urge you to re-evaluate the force-feeding policies at Guantanamo Bay and put in place the most humane policies possible."
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/feinstein-stop-force-feeding-guantanamo-bay-detainees
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/feinstein-stop-force-feeding-guantanamo-bay-detainees
Now, let's say the administration stops this practice. What happens if a prisoner dies?
War crimes tribunal orders force-feeding of Serbian warlord
The UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague last night ordered the force-feeding of a Serbian warlord and senior politician who has been on hunger strike in custody for almost a month.
The decision, the first such order since the court was set up more than a decade ago to deal with war crimes in the former Yugoslavia, came after a medical examination of Vojislav Seselj concluded that he might be a fortnight away from dying.
<...>
The tribunal last night told Dutch authorities to force-feed Mr Seselj if there was a risk of him dying. "There is a prevailing interest in continuing with the trial of the accused in order to serve the ends of justice," it said in a statement. "The trial ... should not be undermined by the accused's manipulative behaviour."
<...>
While stating that any force-feeding deemed necessary for lifesaving purposes should not contradict "compelling internationally accepted standards of medical ethics or binding rules of international law", the judges at the tribunal also noted that the body of law laid down by the European court of human rights did not view force-feeding as "torture, inhuman or degrading treatment if there is a medical necessity to do so ... and if the manner in which the detainee is force-fed is not inhuman or degrading".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/dec/07/balkans.warcrimes
The UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague last night ordered the force-feeding of a Serbian warlord and senior politician who has been on hunger strike in custody for almost a month.
The decision, the first such order since the court was set up more than a decade ago to deal with war crimes in the former Yugoslavia, came after a medical examination of Vojislav Seselj concluded that he might be a fortnight away from dying.
<...>
The tribunal last night told Dutch authorities to force-feed Mr Seselj if there was a risk of him dying. "There is a prevailing interest in continuing with the trial of the accused in order to serve the ends of justice," it said in a statement. "The trial ... should not be undermined by the accused's manipulative behaviour."
<...>
While stating that any force-feeding deemed necessary for lifesaving purposes should not contradict "compelling internationally accepted standards of medical ethics or binding rules of international law", the judges at the tribunal also noted that the body of law laid down by the European court of human rights did not view force-feeding as "torture, inhuman or degrading treatment if there is a medical necessity to do so ... and if the manner in which the detainee is force-fed is not inhuman or degrading".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/dec/07/balkans.warcrimes
The best way out of this situation is to end the practice, release the prisoners and close Gitmo. Can that happen before a tragedy (death by starvation)?
New State Dept. Envoy Begins Work Of Closing Guantánamo
The new State Department special envoy for closing the United States military's detention center located at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba began the effort to shut down the polarizing prison camp, McClatchy reported Thursday.
Clifford Sloan, a former publisher of Slate magazine and a Washington attorney whos worked in all three branches of government, embarked on a one-day tour of the prison facility, where he had discussions with military and medical personnel.
In a major national security speech in May, President Barack Obama vowed to close Gitmo, which he said has "become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law." Obama has drawn criticism, mostly from the left, for failing to close the detention center during his first term in office, despite his 2008 campaign pledge to do so.
President Obama has been very clear as he laid out the goal,and the objective is to close Guantánamo," Sloan told McClatchy. Our marching orders are clear.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/new-state-dept-envoy-begins-work-of-closing
The new State Department special envoy for closing the United States military's detention center located at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba began the effort to shut down the polarizing prison camp, McClatchy reported Thursday.
Clifford Sloan, a former publisher of Slate magazine and a Washington attorney whos worked in all three branches of government, embarked on a one-day tour of the prison facility, where he had discussions with military and medical personnel.
In a major national security speech in May, President Barack Obama vowed to close Gitmo, which he said has "become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law." Obama has drawn criticism, mostly from the left, for failing to close the detention center during his first term in office, despite his 2008 campaign pledge to do so.
President Obama has been very clear as he laid out the goal,and the objective is to close Guantánamo," Sloan told McClatchy. Our marching orders are clear.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/new-state-dept-envoy-begins-work-of-closing
ACLU Comment on Appointment of Envoy to Close Guantánamo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023036083
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jose Padilla has absolutely nothing to do with a discussion about whistleblowers. Nothing! n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#22
The point of this subthread is that AMERICAN CITIZENS are/have been TORTURED in US CUSTODY.
yodermon
Jul 2013
#57
Padilla has everything to do with what American citizens who are fugitives from justice might
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#61
Bush sanctioning torture and Jose Padilla have absolutely nothing to do with whistleblowers. n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#63
Military courts-martial and civilian prosecutions are totally different animals
frazzled
Jul 2013
#13
Clint Eastwood has always been a Republican and a conservative, ran for office as one years ago.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#28
You made a claim about them that was no true. It is that simple. You made it up.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#53
Right. I was wrong. But most people assumed they were something other than Conservative/Libertarian.
randome
Jul 2013
#66
Manning is being tried under a different system so I don't know what the standards for bail are.
arely staircase
Jul 2013
#47
We hadn't yet developed the tendency to throw people into the hole so as to keep them incommunicado
Romulus Quirinus
Jul 2013
#34
Mr. Kim didn't embarass the same people that Mr. Snowden did, nor did Mr. Kim threaten their power.
Romulus Quirinus
Jul 2013
#39
Are you talking about Snowden releasing U.S. state secrets to other countries? n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#40
And you speak under what authority as to that which is in the hearts of others? 'I know you want'
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#52