Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Zimmerman said the gun was behind his hip. [View all]Atman
(31,464 posts)38. Zim would not have needed "self defense" if he just minded his own business.
He STALKED Martin. He went after him. I call total bullshit on the point that Martin hid in the bushes so he could jump out at the guy carrying the gun. Total bullshit. It makes not sense. Zimmerman was hunting for one of the fucking punk assholes that always get away. It just makes no sense for Martin to attack the vigilante while he could have just hidden in the bushes until he had the chance to go home.
I'm testifying tomorrow.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is not proof that Zimmerman had the gun out when he approached Martin n/t
Lurks Often
Jul 2013
#8
It comes down to can they believe the only eye witness who has been proven a liar.
uppityperson
Jul 2013
#20
I'd like to know how Zim could even reach the gun which was suppose to be behind his butt.
Auntie Bush
Jul 2013
#4
Exactly, there is no physical way Trayvon could have done what Zimmerman contends he did...
Spazito
Jul 2013
#31
Yes. And Z also said he was getting smothered by another of Trayvon the Octupus's hands
uppityperson
Jul 2013
#44