General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NOW It IS About Snowden. [View all]ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)It is called, in Grammar, the Generic You, and was clearly in response to your "We".
To quote the immortal Samuel L. Jackson: "English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?"
Although you, bvar, have called Obama "a willing tool of the Ownership Class", a "Corporatist", a "Corporatist evil", "half-Republican", implied that ProSense was a paid shill, I will say, having gone personally back over your record, that you have not called Obama a NAZI or Brownshirt. (Thank heaven for small favors.) So that generic "you" part of my comment is intended for others of your side's "we" that do these things.
I also must say, now that I look at your record, that you are indeed an equal opportunity hater. You appear to hate all other Democratic Presidents and candidates as well, except for FDR every once in a while, and maybe Kucinich and Wellstone (though I'm sure if I dig far enough, I'd likely find hatred there as well). So I really cannot say that you personally seem to be attacking Obama in a way that is terribly out of step with the way you hate everyone else.
You do, however, agree with Republicans calling for Eric Holder to resign over fast-and-furious (even though most of that was approved before he was in office) - yet at the same time call people who ever agree with Republican ever to be unacceptable as Democrats, bashing Obama over that. But I'll put that down as just garden variety hypocrisy, not as the kind of people who had no problem with every other President until Obama.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
/ I believe I'm still within the lines of what is acceptable according to D.U. policy, especially since a response was demanded