General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you know that GZ wasn't "on patrol" for his nonexistent Neighborhood Watch, [View all]DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Blame him for what he did, but once he's charged with a crime, he's got a right to present a defense and a right to have the State prove its case. Blame the outcome on the trial on the prosecution and particularly on the police witnesses. They were in the tank for Zimmerman from the beginning. The trial was a charade. The defense knew it. Why else would a defense lawyer ever dare to ask a police witness for the state if he thought the defendant was "credible"? In normal circumstances, the cop would tee that up and crush you. Not only did he ask it and get the answer he wanted, the State didn't even immediately object to what any first year law student knows is vouching for another witness. What prosecutor raises "questions" for the jury in closing argument? None in the more than 100 criminal jury trials I've done. That's what I do. Questions=doubts.
At the end of the day, those cops didn't think Zimmerman did anything wrong and they did everything they could to torpedo their own case. That's what ought to be most troubling to us about this trial.