Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)

16. I agree... Now after reading the article

Reply to avebury (Reply #13)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:52 PM

Jul 2013

I see that the book deal is not in place, she just signed with an agent. However this does not negate my statement, they had to be working on this from the time they found out she made the jury. Her and her lawyer husband saw dollar signs.

Plus, how the hell did she get on the jury? CCW permit and the "person of color" statement should have given the prosecutors a clue..

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] devilgrrl Jul 2013 OP

I've heard "man of color" and "people of color" used as inoffensive terms. She could have said much Erose999 Jul 2013 #1

Check out Juror B-76 Horse with no Name Jul 2013 #38

She was a juror of retarded soul development Berlum Jul 2013 #2

wow... Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #3

Sure! She was Zimmerman's peer. nt postulater Jul 2013 #14

Gee, I guess her hatred of the media has turned to love now... Spazito Jul 2013 #4

I know, right!? City Lights Jul 2013 #6

Yep, it certainly tells me all I need to know about this juror and... Spazito Jul 2013 #12

I really think that jurors should be banned from avebury Jul 2013 #5

Oh this deal was made way before the trial was over... SomethingFishy Jul 2013 #9

I would have a major problem with that because avebury Jul 2013 #13

I agree... Now after reading the article SomethingFishy Jul 2013 #16

Agree marions ghost Jul 2013 #31

I think they should be banned from profiting period TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #41

She's already signed a book deal Blackford Jul 2013 #7

believes riots happened = gets her info from Fox News. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #8

She held a CCW, too Blackford Jul 2013 #10

Juries can be easily rigged marions ghost Jul 2013 #33

I think she is full of shit. Rex Jul 2013 #11

Plus her mind was made up before she was seated Blackford Jul 2013 #15

Yes this is what we get with low information jurors Rex Jul 2013 #18

That is what she did Corgigal Jul 2013 #22

Sadly she won't be the first one or last one to do so imo. Rex Jul 2013 #23

I wonder what her Freeper name is? n/t Blackford Jul 2013 #17

Eggs-actly. [n/t] stranger81 Jul 2013 #26

People should contact Martin Literary Mangement avebury Jul 2013 #19

This is interesting, to say the least... Spazito Jul 2013 #20

excellent points grasswire Jul 2013 #29

I would very much like to know who this "high ranking producer" was... Spazito Jul 2013 #39

That does sound fishy. In addition this juror's husband is an attorney AND avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #32

It certainly raises questions in my mind... Spazito Jul 2013 #34

To be fair, Trayvon was 17 so he was certainly a "boy". Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #21

Boy of color isn't racist... Pelican Jul 2013 #24

Unbelievable. stranger81 Jul 2013 #25

i knew some of the jurors noiretextatique Jul 2013 #27

Knock, Knock searchingforlight Jul 2013 #28

I don't like the media myself. LWolf Jul 2013 #30

CCW, and how did she think stupidly think there were "riots in Sanford" if Cha Jul 2013 #35

and the usuals still trying to defend this shit and say there is no racism JI7 Jul 2013 #37

Well I call myself a woman of color. n/t vaberella Jul 2013 #36

"an unfortunate incident that happened." sheshe2 Jul 2013 #40