Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)

2. They never even attempted to relate to Rachel. This is sad. They could have questioned her

Reply to KT2000 (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 09:59 PM

Jul 2013

beforehand.

They did such a shitty job with their witnesses. At the very least, they were lazy and negligent. At worst, they deliberately sabotaged their own case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

rachel jeantel is on piers morgan [View all] DesertFlower Jul 2013 OP

Saw some of that KT2000 Jul 2013 #1

They never even attempted to relate to Rachel. This is sad. They could have questioned her Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #2

They threw it. There is no other explanation laundry_queen Jul 2013 #4

i thought she was a great witness even though DesertFlower Jul 2013 #6

She was a very different person from the one we saw on the witness stand. femmocrat Jul 2013 #3

can you blame her? DesertFlower Jul 2013 #5