Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dsc

(53,404 posts)

2. I think we are too often looking for ignorant jurors on that type of case

Reply to Junkdrawer (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:24 PM

Jul 2013

I think people can, and often do, ignore previous knowledge when they are on jury duty. As a prosecutor I surely would have gotten rid of her in a new york minute.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In High Profile Cases, Jurors will be Either Liars or the Terminally Dim.... [View all] Junkdrawer Jul 2013 OP

I am always reminded of a comment by dan fielding on "night court". "a jury of my PEERS? niyad Jul 2013 #1

LOL truth. nt laundry_queen Jul 2013 #6

I think we are too often looking for ignorant jurors on that type of case dsc Jul 2013 #2

Knock knock Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #3

I've wondered about Tien1985 Jul 2013 #4

If true would explain the OJ jury. NT Elmergantry Jul 2013 #5