Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post here to admit you were wrong about Snowden and NSA [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)60. well, rightwingers don't have a monopoly on dishonest dumbasshood
as they don't a great deal else.
It's really boiled down to but certainly not limited to this from the beginning with me
But the governments creative re-interpretation of one provision, known as Section 215, to justify collection of every Americans telephone records has turned Sensenbrenner into a critic of the national security establishment. Here he is earlier Wednesday at a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee, berating Deputy Attorney General James Cole on the governments interpretation of Section 215:
Section 215 requires the government to certify that its information requests are relevant to an ongoing terrorist investigation. But Sensenbrenner notes that the government claims that records of every phone call in America is relevant to a terrorism investigation. He asked: Doesnt that make a mockery of the legal standard, because youre trying to have it both ways? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/07/17/whoa-watch-the-patriot-acts-author-warn-congress-might-cancel-the-spying-program/
Anybody that has tried to polish that particular turd has been either too ignorant/lacking in understanding to be in the debate, or in the only plausible alternative, approving of that interpretation.
BHO certainly has been, which is why I've noted several times since this broke, this is one of the reasons why he has more ownership of it than they're willing to give him. http://blog.sfgate.com/techchron/2013/06/07/obama-responds-to-spying-scandal-answers-charge-that-no-one-has-made/ That's what this is really all about for them -- denial/ego preservation, or hero worship. The latter I find highly amusing given the way they've tried to silence all the thanks Snowden deserves, and the "hero" status some have given him.
And having so much confidence in the idea that they wouldn't be abusing stuff, being who and what they are, is either mindnumbingly or painfully stupid imo. Why it's been so difficult to think or imagine that BHO would sign off on this stuff has a limited number of explanations in any case.
The most stupid are those still asking for "evidence".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I didnt say I disagreed with you Civil, just that its to bad we live in the real world.
cstanleytech
Jul 2013
#117
That's pretty chickenshit compared to sending big chunks of US manufacturing capacity there, includi
eridani
Jul 2013
#99
China already has anything we ever had that was of value -- except our land.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#73
Waiting for the new talking points to come back from focus group testing. n/t
backscatter712
Jul 2013
#41
In other words there is no evidence, and you don't need no stinkin' evidence.
bornskeptic
Jul 2013
#132
you still have morons here that insist evo morales' plane wasn't denied airspace..
frylock
Jul 2013
#6
Lol! Trying to sell piss as lemonade. The tenacity is something else and not good either n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#11
But...but...libertarian! Chinese spy! China hates freedom! I mean Russian spy! RUSSIA hates freedom!
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#7
Wait a minute....pole dancing girlfriend??? I may need to do more research........
7962
Jul 2013
#28
Not only is it a legal warrant but the courts have ruled for decades that metadata is not protected.
randome
Jul 2013
#67
I very much doubt that it's legal, except in secret interpretations of the law.
Th1onein
Jul 2013
#141
I disagree with so many things in this post I don't know where to begin.
dreamnightwind
Jul 2013
#120
There are several useless liars here who will never admit they were wrong
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2013
#20
I don't see anyone calling you names. Funny how that one-way street works, huh?
randome
Jul 2013
#31
O.K., we're at the go-our-separate-ways point, I hope amicably. I really thought I was clear
UTUSN
Jul 2013
#107
Gosh, not to flog a dead horse, but I SAID I NEVER separate the two and won't start now. Please. nt
UTUSN
Jul 2013
#112
Snowden STOLE classified government documents, his publicly admitted crimes are felonies.
Tx4obama
Jul 2013
#50
I'm throwing my vote in with deputizing you and making you go arrest him.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#89
How would they collect a paycheck if they conceded the talking points they're paid to be spamming?nt
backscatter712
Jul 2013
#84
I understand the sentiment and where it is coming from (I think), but I'm not
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#110