General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Re: Martin/Zimmerman - why was / is there an effort to paint a picture that wasn't / isn't real? [View all]OwnedByCats
(805 posts)They report a lot of things that turn out to be false. You really cannot trust them. Here is an example of what I mean ...
When Sandy Hook first happened, instead of reporting they didn't have any details, they reported that Adam's mother was a teacher there. There is an infamous clip where a reporter claimed the school nurse told her that his mother worked there, that she saw Adam and hid under her desk. Then it was reported she was a substitute teacher. Then come to find out she didn't work there at all. Then the school nurse does an interview saying all she saw was his feet, didn't know who he was and she didn't know his mother.
That is one of many many reasons I take everything they report with a huge grain of salt. All they care about is ratings, the truth does not matter anymore.
That's why I don't outright condemn Zimmerman. I waited for the trial and there just wasn't enough evidence presented to support 2nd degree. I wasn't there, I did not witness the attack and I'm not going to pretend I did and make assumptions about either one of them. There was a trial but the evidence failed to show evil intent. Of course many people don't appreciate that I don't feel comfortable assuming, but that's how I am.