Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: bank repos wrong house, gets rid of property, refuses to make restitution [View all]Jenoch
(7,720 posts)119. I might suggest
that it is likely that the copper may have been stolen by thieves rather than the foreclosed former owners of the home.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
133 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
bank repos wrong house, gets rid of property, refuses to make restitution [View all]
littlewolf
Jul 2013
OP
What about theft, unlawful taking, or whatever that jurisdiction cares to call it? (NT)
Heywood J
Jul 2013
#123
A conviction for burglary requires proof of specific intent, not proof of a general intent.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#115
Do you have the prosecutor's phone number? Why not give him a call and explain it to him?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#124
This is not the type of lawsuit for which pain and suffering are compensated.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#86
They might not have intended to burglarize the home but they did intend to remove the contents
ladjf
Jul 2013
#67
Whether they intended to steal her propert or not, the end result is THEY STOLE HER PROPERTY!
Fla Dem
Jul 2013
#127
The minute you break into property you know is not your own you have committed a crime.
former9thward
Jul 2013
#74
Proof of a general intent is not sufficient. A specific intent is required.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#88
He was charged with trespassing and destruction of property, not burglary.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#89
You did say, while apparently being confused over the intent issue, "So this guy should not be
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#96
The bank should be. But you can't force the police to do anything that they don't want to do.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#101
If there was "no intent" the bank should have bent over backwards to fix things...
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#80
She should press charges for breaking and entering and grand larceny. This is THEFT, not a mistake.
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#14
That's *Crazy*. She should dial 911 and record it. There should be cameras there when the police
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#17
I'm coming to your house while you're gone, and after I pillage all of your possessions, I'm going
LaydeeBug
Jul 2013
#110
Not only all the other stuff but an AWFUL business decision as well, the difference between
hughee99
Jul 2013
#26
Seriously, burglary requires a specific intent and none can be shown. She even said it was a mistake
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#91
The Wholesale/Retail argument is an example of why the number of lawsuits go up.
Dustlawyer
Jul 2013
#35
With the mounting anger at their callous injustices, it's no wonder they need to monitor us n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#39
Theft is a crime Mr. Bank President and you and your accomplices should be arrested.
TeamPooka
Jul 2013
#40
minimum settlement after treatment like that... 1st- pay remaining mortgages on house
stlsaxman
Jul 2013
#47
Good fucking lord, does the bank not understand what a goodamned jury would do to them?
Poll_Blind
Jul 2013
#48
When a CEO gets the "needle" for his crimes against America, then I would consider
alfredo
Jul 2013
#51
Just wait... This ASSHOLE will laugh it off and do another house next to the one he was supposed to
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#81
this bank should lose its entire profit for each and every day they make this woman wait
dsc
Jul 2013
#98
Can the new consumer agency do anything about this? Isn't there a law to protect the woman?
kelliekat44
Jul 2013
#100
Exactly. This isn't the first time a bank has foreclosed on the wrong house.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2013
#109
Why aren't they in Jail? They broke into a house and took some else's belongings.
Sivafae
Jul 2013
#106