Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)What Airline Whistleblowers Say About the New Theory on Flight 800 [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by In_The_Wind (a host of the General Discussion forum).
What Airline Whistleblowers Have to Say About the New Theory on Flight 800
There may be enough smoking guns to warrant reopening the investigation
By William J. McGee @williamjmcgee - June 25, 2013
Ive had members of Congress ignore my interview requests and seen my Freedom of Information Act petitions go unanswered, so Ive learned that sometimes former insiders are our only hope for getting information. Last week came news of yet another group of whistleblowers, a cadre of six government and non-government experts who served the National Transportation Safety Board when that independent federal agency investigated the explosion of a Boeing 747 off the coast of Long Island in July 1996. They are the protagonists of a new documentary, TWA Flight 800, that will air July 17 on EPIX-TV. After four years of investigation, the NTSB claimed the cause of Flight 800′s explosion was a mechanical defect, but the new documentary, written and directed by journalist Kristina Borjesson, claims the FBI, NTSB and other government agencies may have covered up that the plane was brought down by a missile strike. Participants in the film have called on the NTSB to reopen the case based on altered physical evidence, suppressed data, and unexamined testimony from hundreds of eyewitnesses.
Of course, in a healthy and functioning democracy, we shouldnt need whistleblowersgovernment employees who uncover waste, fraud, or abuse would be supported straight through to the Oval Office. But many of us know better, especially when it comes to the airline industry. When my book, Attention All Passengers: The Airlines Dangerous Descentand How to Reclaim Our Skies, was published last year and I thanked the brave men and women who are Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation Security Administration, and airline whistleblowers, I was not overstating their importance. These whistleblowers confirmed such problems as defective airline maintenance outsourcing, FAA oversight failures, TSA waste, and many other important findings.
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/25/what-airline-whistleblowers-have-to-say-about-the-new-theory-on-flight-800/#ixzz2aMIxs3lJ
There may be enough smoking guns to warrant reopening the investigation
By William J. McGee @williamjmcgee - June 25, 2013
Ive had members of Congress ignore my interview requests and seen my Freedom of Information Act petitions go unanswered, so Ive learned that sometimes former insiders are our only hope for getting information. Last week came news of yet another group of whistleblowers, a cadre of six government and non-government experts who served the National Transportation Safety Board when that independent federal agency investigated the explosion of a Boeing 747 off the coast of Long Island in July 1996. They are the protagonists of a new documentary, TWA Flight 800, that will air July 17 on EPIX-TV. After four years of investigation, the NTSB claimed the cause of Flight 800′s explosion was a mechanical defect, but the new documentary, written and directed by journalist Kristina Borjesson, claims the FBI, NTSB and other government agencies may have covered up that the plane was brought down by a missile strike. Participants in the film have called on the NTSB to reopen the case based on altered physical evidence, suppressed data, and unexamined testimony from hundreds of eyewitnesses.
Of course, in a healthy and functioning democracy, we shouldnt need whistleblowersgovernment employees who uncover waste, fraud, or abuse would be supported straight through to the Oval Office. But many of us know better, especially when it comes to the airline industry. When my book, Attention All Passengers: The Airlines Dangerous Descentand How to Reclaim Our Skies, was published last year and I thanked the brave men and women who are Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation Security Administration, and airline whistleblowers, I was not overstating their importance. These whistleblowers confirmed such problems as defective airline maintenance outsourcing, FAA oversight failures, TSA waste, and many other important findings.
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/25/what-airline-whistleblowers-have-to-say-about-the-new-theory-on-flight-800/#ixzz2aMIxs3lJ
The author:
William J. McGee
William J. McGee is an aviation journalist and the author of Attention All Passengers: The Airlines Dangerous Descent and How to Reclaim Our Skies, to be published on June 26, 2012. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation in 2010 chose McGee to be the lone consumer advocate on the Future of Aviation Advisory Committee. He also writes a monthly travel column for USAToday.com and has contributed to Condé Nast Traveler, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Money and New York. Prior to becoming a journalist, McGee spent nearly seven years in airline flight operations management; he is an FAA-licensed aircraft dispatcher and served in the U.S. Air Force Auxiliary.
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/contributor/william-j-mcgee/#ixzz2aMIMs97x
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The author mentions the kneejerk rush to slam the movie, sight unseen. I look forward to seeing it.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#3
NO. It's a documentary piecing together EVIDENCE by an award-winning filmmaker.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#20
"There may be enough smoking guns to warrant reopening the investigation."
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#22
The witnesses were NOT ALLOWED to testify. Yet a CIA "simulation" was inserted as the "truth."
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#53
If you believe 200 witnesses are not reliable then please don't watch the video...
think
Jul 2013
#45
Eyewitness accounts are often quite reliable, especially when 200 see the same thing.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#41