Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Airline Whistleblowers Say About the New Theory on Flight 800 [View all]chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)53. The witnesses were NOT ALLOWED to testify. Yet a CIA "simulation" was inserted as the "truth."
Why wouldn't they let these WITNESSES even testify? Do you trust the CIA to "explain" this? Did you watch the video?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The author mentions the kneejerk rush to slam the movie, sight unseen. I look forward to seeing it.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#3
NO. It's a documentary piecing together EVIDENCE by an award-winning filmmaker.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#20
"There may be enough smoking guns to warrant reopening the investigation."
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#22
The witnesses were NOT ALLOWED to testify. Yet a CIA "simulation" was inserted as the "truth."
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#53
If you believe 200 witnesses are not reliable then please don't watch the video...
think
Jul 2013
#45
Eyewitness accounts are often quite reliable, especially when 200 see the same thing.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#41