Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Christopher Hitchens always had a drink in his hand, but he was one of the finest minds in the media [View all]napoleon_in_rags
(3,992 posts)90. I agree he was wrong. I'm just saying he ruffled a lot of feathers deeply.
More than they should have been, after what was at the end of the day just ideas. His ideas were truly provocative, and I remember him positively for that: A lot of the best ideas in the world, evolution, protestantism, ruffled feathers the same way in their time. And provocative ideas get us all thinking.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Christopher Hitchens always had a drink in his hand, but he was one of the finest minds in the media [View all]
GiaGiovanni
Jul 2013
OP
Andrew Sullivan 'recanted' but he also spent much time attacking those who
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#13
Couldn't agree more. He was a pseudo intellectual with a massive ego and looked down on most of the
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#46
Yeh, Hitchens and Sullivan were nauseating with their warmongering neocon cheerleading.
Zorra
Jul 2013
#49
A ridiculous and snipey article. Hitchens was an intellectual through and through and it is easy
RadiationTherapy
Jul 2013
#55
You'll have to be more specific than that if you are interested in talking about this.
RadiationTherapy
Jul 2013
#91
^Nailed!1^ What he had was a traditional/rigorous education. Even Russell BRAND makes U.S. look dumb
UTUSN
Jul 2013
#86
his main criticism in the written piece is that if democrats were in charge after 9/11
RadiationTherapy
Jul 2013
#92
He and Cockburn used to make the Nation a joy to read, but he went off the rails after 9/11.
Comrade Grumpy
Jul 2013
#54
Sorry I dont credit any Iraq war cheerleaders with being one of the finest minds
Egnever
Jul 2013
#59
What he always had, unfortunately, was a cigarette. I adored him and his brilliance, nonetheless!
WinkyDink
Jul 2013
#60
I agree he was wrong. I'm just saying he ruffled a lot of feathers deeply.
napoleon_in_rags
Jul 2013
#90
He was very clever, very glib, and very, very mean. Also he was shitfaced more often than not.
MADem
Jul 2013
#84
His argument against Mother Teresa was well founded if you follow her story
GiaGiovanni
Jul 2013
#85