Ohio Bank Still REFUSING TO PAY For STEALING Everything From Woman's Home

[Orrex]

45. My (perhaps incorrect) understanding is that it was due to a mistaken address

If that's the case, then it would seem that she'll be hard-pressed to assign liability to anyone beyond the person or agency who was charged with verifying the physical address while on-site.

If the judge approved foreclosure of the correct address, then I can't imagine that he or she will be found liable in any way. It's also likely that the bank worked through a subcontractor, so the bank itself will likely be insulated from liability.


Don't get me wrong--my personal feeling is that everyone involved should be held criminally liable in the same way that the victim would be liable if she'd broken into, cleaned out & sold the bank president's home. She should be rendered financially secure for life IMO, and the bank should be charged with every applicable crime.

However, I know that banks spend billions on lawyers to protect them from accountability, so I will be amazed if the victim receives anything approaching appropriate compensation.