I'm a little puzzled here. Remember the Outrageous! Outrageous!

[chervilant]

65. Let me see if I've got this right:

Those of us who want to know who else in the NSA dropped the ball (with regards to establishing protocols to prevent massive 'lifts' of data, among other things) are "anti-Democratic Party extremists"? Expressing our concerns about this issue is "all emotional argumentation, rejection of data that doesn't fit the preferred narrative, outright tribalism, puerile childishness (like posting ROTFL emotes), pure unreasoned hatred, and the conflation of...on the spot conspiracy theorizing with actual established fact"? Asking for information about how Snowden got out of the building with massive amounts of data is unreasonably "expecting any organization to be 100% perfect from criminal actions" or "the cognitive dissonance of thinking that the NSA is all-knowing and all-powerful while at the same time being completely unable to do anything right"?

Do you work for the NSA? Do you have any information for those of us who are asking questions--those of us who don't fit into your above-described pigeon holes?