Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: @ggreenwald: Would the WH prefer mass, indiscriminate, bulk, unvetted simultaneous disclosure? [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)29. For the record
no one 'directed damnation' at Manning because he dumped all of his information at once. The criticism was directed at the fact that he 'dumped' hundreds of thousands of documents that he could not possibly have vetted before disclosing them. Ergo, he had no way of knowing what it was he was exposing - but did it anyway.
Greenwald, on the other hand, claims to have information that is 'vital' to the American citizenry, and the world at large - which he is anxious to impart, as soon as people shell out money for his upcoming book.
There is a difference -- see it now?
Good, I knew you could figure that one out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
@ggreenwald: Would the WH prefer mass, indiscriminate, bulk, unvetted simultaneous disclosure? [View all]
dkf
Aug 2013
OP
It's about our surveillance state, and a President still lying about it. Please read:
chimpymustgo
Aug 2013
#57
Ah, so you would prefer they carry on with their careful analysis before publishing
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#35
Actually, Greenwald is getting the last laugh and will continue to get the last laugh.
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#24
WRONG, people are laughing AT Greenwald ... he'll sell a book and Paulians will buy it along
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#68
Changes the integrity of their claims which MOST of the NSA hub bub hinges on, the claimes
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#14
Their self-reinforcing pack-like behavior on these threads has passed the "forum post" stage
Maedhros
Aug 2013
#46
I think he's a bit busy right now reporting on the biggest story of the century
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#38
It's like a painfully slow pas de deux, Obama doing a plie and Greenwald following behind him.
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#27
No, we'd prefer that you package it all in a book and charge us for the 'freedom' you bestow!
randome
Aug 2013
#6
I doubt they would want to stray from their current course of putting up
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#41
That IS direct access to their servers. As noted in their TOP SECRET documents.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#61
It's 'direct access' to one secure FTP server per company. Not the same thing as Greenwald said.
randome
Aug 2013
#62
Speaking at the Cato Institute is common for a number of people across the political spectrum.
Maedhros
Aug 2013
#47
Did Ron Wyden write whitepaper for CATO? Appear at Benefactor's Summit's as a party premium?
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#64
Who cares what wrong doers think, I'd prefer a deliberate and careful release
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#32