Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 03:27 PM Aug 2013

4th Amendment for the 21st century [View all]

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, digital footprint, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


digital footprint being any data of any form which is capable of being associated with a specific citizen.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
4th Amendment for the 21st century [View all] PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 OP
There definitely needs to be discussion on the handling of data. Egnever Aug 2013 #1
this would require a complete reversal of how we currently handle data PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #2
There are unintended consequences Egnever Aug 2013 #3
I have had the phone call when I was traveling PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #5
I would love to just outright agree with you but Egnever Aug 2013 #9
it would certainly break the internet as we know it. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #10
It might not be Egnever Aug 2013 #11
psst... usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #14
headscratch PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #15
The Privacy Pirates don't like restraints usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #6
I do wish someone up on the hill would stand up for our digital rights. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #7
They didn't need to edit an existing civil right though usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #8
I'd say and effects covers that, too usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #4
Yes, because to DOJ does not share your view PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #12
Time to go to SCOTUS usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4th Amendment for the 21s...